Comments Thread For: Richardson: Flagrant Fouls Against Hopkins Must Stop

[ИATAS]

Because near tackling your opponent and rushing behind his back to rabbit punch him isn't fouling.

Lol Hopkins never tried to tackle Murat. Murat threw blatant low blows, constantly put him in head locks, hit after the bell, tried to headbutt and of course tried to punch him twice on the ground.

[-PBP-]

Smoger lets them fight. That's why everybody likes him. But when he gives you instructions, he expects you to follow them. Murat didn't on numerous occasions and got on his bad side.

[IronDanHamza]

Smoger lets them fight. That's why everybody likes him. But when he gives you instructions, he expects you to follow them. Murat didn't on numerous occasions and got on his bad side.

Yes that's right.

But when Hopkins does it it's "You good Bern?"

[IronDanHamza]

Because there was only one guy blatantly fouling, duh

It's funny because you might even believe it.

So when the ref told them to break and Hopkins walks toward Murat whilst his back was turned and punched him right in his back that wasn't a blatant foul I suppose?

Murat hitting Hopkins after the bell is a blatant foul, but then Hopkins retaliating straight after and hitting him back isn't?

Both did a lot of blatant things against the rules, one guy was badgered all night, the other had not a single word said to them.

"Great job by Smoger!!"

[ИATAS]

Yes that's right.

But when Hopkins does it it's "You good Bern?"

When Hopkins did what? Like I said Murat was very blatant with his fouls. Hopkins was fighting pretty clean.

[IronDanHamza]

Because near tackling your opponent and rushing behind his back to rabbit punch him isn't fouling.

What were you watching???

Hopkins didn't foul once the whole fight.

Certainly nothing he should have been warned for.

[Carpe Diem]

Hopkins is the king of dirty illegal tactics. ****m is just a whiner.

[IronDanHamza]

When Hopkins did what? Like I said Murat was very blatant with his fouls. Hopkins was fighting pretty clean.

Oh, I don't know.

Perhaps when the ref told them to stop fighting and Hopkins casually walked up to him and punched him?

Or did you miss that?

[GeneralZod]

Lol Hopkins never tried to tackle Murat. Murat threw blatant low blows, constantly put him in head locks, hit after the bell, tried to headbutt and of course tried to punch him twice on the ground.

Hopkins hardly even tried clinches this fight, he basically bum rushed him into a hold and almost slipped everywhere.

[ИATAS]

It's funny because you might even believe it.

So when the ref told them to break and Hopkins walks toward Murat whilst his back was turned and punched him right in his back that wasn't a blatant foul I suppose?

Murat hitting Hopkins after the bell is a blatant foul, but then Hopkins retaliating straight after and hitting him back isn't?

Both did a lot of blatant things against the rules, one guy was badgered all night, the other had not a single word said to them.

"Great job by Smoger!!"

Oh so now Hopkins punched murat in the back? Lmao! Murat turned his back, which you're not supposed to do, hopkins got to his side and hit his face at an angle and unloaded on his face. Totally legal you dumb ****. Jesus, all you do is complain, most negative poster on nsb.

And actually Smoger did have words with Hopkins, rewatch it. On at least two occasions Smoger said to Hopkins you can't be doing that, bernard.