I think there is much to be said for them having missed the chance to be further elevated if they'd been better engaged in the late 90s and early 2000s. Guys like Ike, Tua, and Rahman were being tested far harder at the same time. Wlad at least walked through Byrd and beat McCline when he was a serious contender. he also shelled Schultz and Barrett when they were still solid. That he overcame his setbacks and has gone on the run he has, winning every belt but the WBC, is laudable.
Vitali doesn't have as deep a roster to draw from even if he 'avenged' the Sanders and Purrity losses (the latter is a bad loss for Wlad and not a good win for Vitali years later). And for all his accolades, Vitali beating Sanders wasn't something impossible (Sanders was a one trick pony who happened to land on the right guy on the right night). Rahman beat a better conditioned Sanders earlier. Rahman also knocked Lewis out. It seems sometimes Vitali gets more credit for losing against the worst Lewis there ever was than Rahman gets for finishing an admittedly not in peak shape then either Lewis in a good fight. Where he trumps Rahman is in his ability to stay in shape and last.
Vitali doesn't have as deep a roster to draw from even if he 'avenged' the Sanders and Purrity losses (the latter is a bad loss for Wlad and not a good win for Vitali years later). And for all his accolades, Vitali beating Sanders wasn't something impossible (Sanders was a one trick pony who happened to land on the right guy on the right night). Rahman beat a better conditioned Sanders earlier. Rahman also knocked Lewis out. It seems sometimes Vitali gets more credit for losing against the worst Lewis there ever was than Rahman gets for finishing an admittedly not in peak shape then either Lewis in a good fight. Where he trumps Rahman is in his ability to stay in shape and last.

Comment