Vitali's mythical poor resume pt 2

[crold1]

I think Tunney and Walcott would be difficult fights for both VK and WK. I'm not saying that they would lose - only that it would be difficult. I think Schmeling and Max Baer would also be good fights. And you didn't mention Dempsey or Johnson

It's really hard to compare eras. Would you have VK go back in time, make much less money, have to fight when hurt (thinking of Braddock here) and have much different judging and refs. When you got a TKO loss in 1950s or earlier you were taking some serious punishment. Fights were not stopped quickly as they are today.

Or would you have the fighters of yesteryear fight 12 round fights, have 4-8 months between fights? It's hard to compare and weight is not the end-all-be-all. Especially as much of these modern "big" heavyweights are fat and out of shape. Arreola should have been at least 20 pounds, if not 30 pounds lighter when he took on VK.

I'm not as sure on Johnson and Dempsey. Think those matches could depend on era and rules. I think Louis just beats both.

[LacedUp]

Okay then, pull up every months top ten ring rankings and post them. Then and only then will you be able to prove that he has never been rated in the top ten.

You are speaking out of you a55 and everybody knows it.
You don't know **** and you're an a55hole to boot.

So YOU claim Chisora was in the top 10 at the time, then 1) I prove he wasn't in the annual rankings and 2) prove that he wasn't in the top 10 when Vitali fought him.

Now, since you are the one who claimed it, and also claimed I hadn't done research despite proving you wrong. I think it's time for you to prove what you started out by saying, which was that he was a top 10 fighter.

You are backtracking now, and you keep digging yourself further and further down your troll hole.

[chav]

Jab, I love watching you in these threads, you come in, take on all the Kliterati and usually beat them senseless with facts that they get stunned, punch drunk and KO'd.
A true 1 man army

[Boxing Goat]

Show me one thing I posted that would equate to trolling please.

Or is it my job to prove you wrong on this one as well?

You're a troll because you show up to any and every Vitali Klitschko thread in an attempt to discredit him. You're in denial man. That's plain and clear to see.

[LacedUp]

You're a troll because you show up to any and every Vitali Klitschko thread in an attempt to discredit him. You're in denial man. That's plain and clear to see.

And you show up to ride his peepee. What's the difference?

What denial am I in exactly? You are the one saying Vitali has beaten 10 top ten fighters including hide, Solis, Chisora and Williams - who were not in the top 10 when they fought Vitali. I've proven that to you, yet you claim to know some mythical ranking that you remember 'seeing' but fail to provide any proof of your claims.

As I exposed you, you backtrack and try to include Shannon Briggs' fat corpse as a top 10 fighter.

But yeah, i'm the one in denial.

[Boxing Goat]

No you haven't. And I doubt it.

You're an idiot that knows nothing about me.

Now, you're ignored.

:blow:

[JAB5239]

Jab, I love watching you in these threads, you come in, take on all the Kliterati and usually beat them senseless with facts that they get stunned, punch drunk and KO'd.
A true 1 man army

The Kliterati? Lmao!!!

[Boxing Goat]

Stop thinking you know something about lacedup.

How do your know he hasn't been following boxing since the 70s?

Maybe he has, but he hasn't learned more about boxing than I have over the last two decades. I do know that for a fact. He would have to do it for a living.

If it were his profession or something, he wouldnt be so biased against Vitali.

It's obvious, he's no expert. If he's going to says ****** things like he knows me, I will do the same.

Oh, by the way, are you his daddy to come and help defend him or something?

Are you the assumption police now too? What a tool.

[JAB5239]

Maybe he has, but he hasn't learned more about boxing than I have over the last two decades. I do know that for a fact. He would have to do it for a living.

If it were his profession or something, he would be so biased against Vitali.

It's obvious, he's no expert. If he's going to says ****** things like he knows me, I will do the same.
Oh, by the way, are you his daddy to come and help defend him or something?

Are you the assumption police now too? What a tool.

Look at this clown using the old "Im rubber your glue" defense! Just man up and make a decent argument for a change, instead of wowing is with how long you've been watching boxing and how much you know!

[LacedUp]

Maybe he has, but he hasn't learned more about boxing than I have over the last two decades. I do know that for a fact. He would have to do it for a living.

If it were his profession or something, he would be so biased against Vitali.

It's obvious, he's no expert. If he's going to says ****** things like he knows me, I will do the same.

Oh, by the way, are you his daddy to come and help defend him or something?

Are you the assumption police now too? What a tool.

I don't want to get into a **** swinging contest with you, but you are out of your depth here.

But thanks for you condescending, arrogant posts that clearly show what a lack of overall understanding of boxing you have.

So much so, that you completely ignore the fact that I started out by saying how highly I rate Vitali as a fighter, but unfortunately, his era hasn't followed his standards on many occassions, add to the fact that he hasn't even fought the best of his era - and he has no claim whatsoever to be called an ATG.