Those who rank Roy Jones over Hopkins..why?
Collapse
-
-
-
Dude, you for real,, you thought winky won that fight,,, cant hate too much because i have been in the minority before when it comes to scorecards,,, but i thought for sure hopkins won that fight,,,,, winky didnt do much after about 5 rounds,,Comment
-
I thought Hopkins won but still, Wright had no business at light heavyweight, he looked out of shape there and tired. He was already a small middleweight no need to go up to light heavyweight.
I don't give Hopkins much credit for that one, especially since I feel Wright was past it.Comment
-
Nor do I.I thought Hopkins won but still, Wright had no business at light heavyweight, he looked out of shape there and tired. He was already a small middleweight no need to go up to light heavyweight.
I don't give Hopkins much credit for that one, especially since I feel Wright was past it.
Wright's done nothing before and nothing since at 170 lbs.Comment
-
title defenses mean nothing???since when?they mean everything,they=dominance over a long period of time and means he cleaned the division out..since wen does defending your title mean nothing?Roy Jones could have had 100 title defences if he decided to milk and stay at 160 for an exhaustingly long amount of time.
Hopkins title defences mean nothing. Title defences in general mean nothing. Less than 10 of those defences were impressive or legitimate wins.
Roy Jones is the better fighter both historically and head to head.Comment
-
Tito and Oscar were little compared to Hopkins so was winky if take hill and Johnson over Oscar and winky jmo but they had no business being at 160 or 170Comment
Comment