Who's cherry picks the most.

[LacedUp]

You mentioned Arreola and you mentioned Scott. Could these fights have been made against the Klitschkos?

You mentioned David Price for ***'s sake

Scott could have. I don't know whether or not Arreola would fight Wlad, has he said he doesn't want to fight a klitschko again or is that just an assumption? Because I could have sworn that Arreola was just fighting for a mandatory position to avenge his defeat to Vitali, and came out and said he wanted a rematch:

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...vyweight-title

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Scott could have. I don't know whether or not Arreola would fight Wlad, has he said he doesn't want to fight a klitschko again or is that just an assumption? Because I could have sworn that Arreola was just fighting for a mandatory position to avenge his defeat to Vitali, and came out and said he wanted a rematch:

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...vyweight-title

Malik Scott has been a pro for 13 years and he's never shown any kind of inclination of getting in line for a title shot but you are dumb enough to think that a fight against a Klitschko has been viable

I'm sure Arreola would want to fight a Klitschko again but his promoter isn't ****** enough to just throw him in there straight away. Yeah he was working his way to a mandatory so how was he an option?

For it to be "cherry picking", these fights actually have to be viable. Learn the meaning of cherry picking before commenting.

[LacedUp]

Malik Scott has been a pro for 13 years and he's never shown any kind of inclination of getting in line for a title shot but you are dumb enough to think that a fight against a Klitschko has been viable

I'm sure Arreola would want to fight a Klitschko again but his promoter isn't ****** enough to just throw him in there straight away. Yeah he was working his way to a mandatory so how was he an option?

For it to be "cherry picking", these fights actually have to be viable. Learn the meaning of cherry picking before commenting.

Dude you are just reaching now. I said Scott would have been a better fight than Pianeta. Did I say it would be an amazing match up that everyone wanted to see? No. I just said it was better. Which it would have been.

Ok once again, you are speculating without putting any evidence up.

Stop trolling dirk.

[Body_Snatcher]

When was the last time Mayweather fought a legit welterweight in his prime?

There's my answer.

when was the last time Pacquiao fought ANYONE in their prime?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Dude you are just reaching now. I said Scott would have been a better fight than Pianeta. Did I say it would be an amazing match up that everyone wanted to see? No. I just said it was better. Which it would have been.

Ok once again, you are speculating without putting any evidence up.

Stop trolling dirk.

No you are reaching to suggest that Malik Scott would have been put in the ring with a Klitschko. You obviously don't understand the concept of cherry picking.

[HeroBando]

Right.. How do you as a challenger cherrypick a champion with a 70% KO ratio and one defeat? The idiocy in that post is unreal. Haye was offered a fight for a larger purse, easier opposition and no options. On top of that, he also fought for getting either Wlad/Vitali in the ring on equal terms and no options.

Oh yeah? So how did he end up "working" with Sauerland for the next 4 fights?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Oh yeah? So how did he end up "working" with Sauerland for the next 4 fights?

The guy eats up the Hayemaker propaganda.

[Thickback]

Why is Danny even an option?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

when was the last time Pacquiao fought ANYONE in their prime?

undefeated Timothy bradley

plus prime MAB, EM, JMM a few times each

plus hatton wasnt shot and was the lineal champ of 140 before manny iced him

Rios is probably as good as he will ever get,,,

lebowado and the guys he fought at 122 and under,,,

[LacedUp]

Oh yeah? So how did he end up "working" with Sauerland for the next 4 fights?

I assume you mean the next 2 fights? Well that was a promotional agreement that worked well for all partners. Haye got a tv deal with ARD and Sauerland co promoted his fights. I don't see what that has to do with options on Valuev? But please enlighten me.

No you are reaching to suggest that Malik Scott would have been put in the ring with a Klitschko. You obviously don't understand the concept of cherry picking.

The guy eats up the Hayemaker propaganda.

So explain this to me Dirk, what made Pianeta deserve a shot more than Malik Scott? Scott has better senior amateur and pro pedigree. He's more known, has a deal with a big American promoter and fights on terrestrial tv in the states. So you can always enlighten me too.

You do know that people are pming saying you are the biggest troll on NSB but I always give you the time of day. But this stuff is unreal.

First you say they were mandatories, which is why the bros fought them. Then you said that didnt matter anyway. Then you say Arreola didn't want to fight them, then I proved he would. Then his manager didn't want him to fight Klitschko. Now you're saying Scott would be a worse fight than Pianeta. What's the next going to be?