Who's cherry picks the most.

[LacedUp]

Then you're a big twat

You can test me on literacy if you like. I'm challenging you. How many years did you go to school?

Long enough to earn two university degrees.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I assume you mean the next 2 fights? Well that was a promotional agreement that worked well for all partners. Haye got a tv deal with ARD and Sauerland co promoted his fights. I don't see what that has to do with options on Valuev? But please enlighten me.

Because Haye called the K2 contract, "a slave contract" because of the options on his future fights which is standard when you aren't the mandatory challenger. Yet he went and signed a contract with Sauerland who had 3 options on his future fights

So explain this to me Dirk, what made Pianeta deserve a shot more than Malik Scott? Scott has better senior amateur and pro pedigree. He's more known, has a deal with a big American promoter and fights on terrestrial tv in the states. So you can always enlighten me too.

Now you're saying Scott would be a worse fight than Pianeta. What's the next going to be?

Don't remember saying whether it would be a better or worse fight. I'm saying it wasn't a viable option. It's basically like saying Liverpool could go sign Messi because he'd be the best option but it's not ***in viable is it? You're just throwing out random names like Scott and David LOL Price saying they are better fights without realising that they wouldn't step in the ring with the Klitschkos. It's only cherry picking if these fights were available and Wlad opted to fight Pianeta instead. THAT's cherry picking. Learn the damn definition already.

[LacedUp]

Because Haye called the K2 contract, "a slave contract" because of the options on his future fights which is standard when you aren't the mandatory challenger. Yet he went and signed a contract with Sauerland who had 3 options on his future fights

Don't remember saying whether it would be a better or worse fight. I'm saying it wasn't a viable option. It's basically like saying Liverpool could go sign Messi because he'd be the best option but it's not ***in viable is it? You're just throwing out random names like Scott and David LOL Price saying they are better fights without realising that they wouldn't step in the ring with the Klitschkos. It's only cherry picking if these fights were available and Wlad opted to fight Pianeta instead. THAT's cherry picking. Learn the damn definition already.

They didn't have options, they were co promoting his fights. Big difference.

You asked which better fights could have been made and I replied. But yet again, you move the goal post so now it's which was a viable option and not which we're better fights.

Anyways. I'm out.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

They didn't have options, they were co promoting his fights. Big difference.

You asked which better fights could have been made and I replied. But yet again, you move the goal post so now it's which was a viable option and not which we're better fights.

Anyways. I'm out.

But they couldn't have been made because they weren't viable! Do you have comprehension difficulties? They are fantasy fights in your ****** head! Wlad vs Price = LOL how??

[Weltschmerz]

Long enough to earn two university degrees.

In what? Sucking davey's ****? Double university degree style?

[Weltschmerz]

LacedUp hating on Vitali.... so hopeless he is............... get a job phaggot

[Dirk Diggler UK]

LacedUp hating on Vitali.... so hopeless he is............... get a job phaggot

Did you know Vitali ducked Seth Mitchell?

[badnewsbrown]

Mayweather no doubt. 10 years of cherry picking now.

[LacedUp]

But they couldn't have been made because they weren't viable! Do you have comprehension difficulties? They are fantasy fights in your ****** head! Wlad vs Price = LOL how??

Did you know Vitali ducked Seth Mitchell?

I don't think you are in a position to call me ****** mate. You are considered #1 troll on NSB.

You said: "which fights could have been made?" Then I list some names, and in your ****** head, they are not "viable" for fantasy reasons?

I started out by saying they didn't duck anyone, didn't I?

I'm really starting to see why people think you are the most ******ed poster online.

[LacedUp]

Dirk ****ler exposed:

Plenty of those fights were mandatories and if you can name fighters that they could have fought instead, Id love to hear them.

Whether they were mandatories or not is kinda irrelevant

if you can name fighters that they could have fought instead, Id love to hear them.

- Instead of Wach, Pianeta, Rahman, Charr, Briggs and Mormeck.

Hmm, let me think... How about Pulev? Helenius? Fury? Price? Haye? Chisora (for Wlad)? or how about Arreola? Glazkov? Mitchell? Banks? Wilder? Jennings? Scott? Any single one of those would have been far far better than the ones I mentioned.

they are scared because that's the holy grail and their careers are over if they get battered by the Klitschkos.

- Speaking about Arreola.

I could have sworn that Arreola was just fighting for a mandatory position to avenge his defeat to Vitali, and came out and said he wanted a rematch:

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...vyweight-title

I'm sure Arreola would want to fight a Klitschko again but

But they couldn't have been made because they weren't viable!

Ehhh???