Wlad surpasses Holmes...
Collapse
-
The first part of my post was NOT incorrect, and you even agreed earlier. Ask any boxing fan, educated or non educated "who is the youngest heavyweight champion ever?". 9 out of 10 times the answer will be Tyson. Maybe 10 out of 10. This is just a fact and if you don't think so then you are either delusional, very new to the sport or you can't admit to it because again, it tears down your arguments.I'm the troll for pointing out the first part of your post is incorrect?
Is it an insult to say someone appears to be uneducated on the matter? I didn't know that. And even if it was, it is certainly not the same as "moron", "Imbecile".
But it just shows the level of intelligence you possess.
So yes, it is insulting to say somebody is uneducated on something they are RIGHT about. Frankly I think you're backpeddling about your hypocrisy and I still think that you are an a$$hole who deserves no respect since you can't seem to give it first.Comment
-
No I'm just saying that Tyson wasn't the youngest champion, but the youngest beltholder. He agrees with me on that one.
I'm just saying that in the history books, Floyd Patterson is still the youngest champion.
did we though? Was he better than Vitali? Than Valuev? Than Ibragimov? Than Haye? We know now that he was, but we didn't know long before Chagaev.
My point is, that Holmes was recognized as the champ. Wlad wasn't recognized as the champ in 2008.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Ken Norton was past his prime and at the time(and till this day) people thought Norton was actually robbed of the win. That was hardly such a great win for Holmes.
And yes, Ali was suffering from Parkinson and was way, way, way past his prime. on top of that he looked drugged up in that fight. Nobody in their right mind would give Holmes credit for that win.Comment
-
My only point was that not everyone considers Tyson as the youngest champion, nor should they.The first part of my post was NOT incorrect, and you even agreed earlier. Ask any boxing fan, educated or non educated "who is the youngest heavyweight champion ever?". 9 out of 10 times the answer will be Tyson. Maybe 10 out of 10. This is just a fact and if you don't think so then you are either delusional, very new to the sport or you can't admit to it because again, it tears down your arguments.
So yes, it is insulting to say somebody is uneducated on something they are RIGHT about. Frankly I think you're backpeddling about your hypocrisy and I still think that you are an a$$hole who deserves no respect since you can't seem to give it first.
What is my hypocrisy exactly?Comment
-
Comment
Comment