Prime Thomas hearns would have beat floyd, there for floyd should watch his mounth and not claim to be GOAT
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Duran: In My Era, Mayweather Would've Been Ordinary
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TheHolyCross View Postfloyd is great, but overrated, he can't handle intelligent pressure, lost vs castillo, and was getting worked by hatton and cotto but both have crap stamina
and yes, although hatton wasn't the most clever in the ring, his gameplan was solid enough(fient the right, throw a straight left to negate the shoulder roll), a little more defense and if his stamina wasn't so poor he could have taken floyd to hell
duran could very well kill floyd, floyd, and manny too, would be ****** to go to welter when monsters like leonard and hearns were around
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheHolyCross View Postfloyd is great, but overrated, he can't handle intelligent pressure, lost vs castillo, and was getting worked by hatton and cotto but both have crap stamina
and yes, although hatton wasn't the most clever in the ring, his gameplan was solid enough(fient the right, throw a straight left to negate the shoulder roll), a little more defense and if his stamina wasn't so poor he could have taken floyd to hell
duran could very well kill floyd, floyd, and manny too, would be ****** to go to welter when monsters like leonard and hearns were around
But in no way shape or form was hatton ever giving floyd the business,, hatton walked into straight rights all fight... FLoyd handled that guy....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Goldie View PostThe onus is on you not me. You're the one trying to make the argument that Floyd's weakness is being attacked to the body. Is the 1st Castillo fight from 11 years ago where he complained of being injured from almost te very beginning the best that you can do? If so, then you haven't done very much to prove your argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carpe Diem View PostYou're blinded by hate to the extent you are letting that cloud your judgement. I'm not saying that Floyd is a better fighter than SRL, but it doesn't take a genius to know that SRL's defensive technique wasn't as fluidly fundamentally sound as guys like, Willie Pep, Pernell and Floyd. He had great footwork[his best defense attribute], and was a better all-around offensive fighter than Floyd, but I'm not impressed with his defensive technique as i am with guys like Pernell and Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View PostDude SRL is on record admitting he cherrypicked Duran in the rematch.
How the f^ck does this dispute my post? Unless you're capable of providing some quotes that indicate Duran wasn't open to the possibility of rematching Leonard, don't even bother.
Better yet, do yourself a favour and refrain from discussing any boxing-related topic that extends beyond the three or four years that you've actually been following, because you're way out of your depth here.
Comment
-
not entirely true. He wouldn't be undefeated as I'm pretty certain Hearns would have beat him but he would have still been elite
Comment
-
I think most posters agree that floyd would be good in any era.....But if he was in the late 70's early 80's he would have been good but never would have been undefeated top draw in boxing like he is today... he would have stayed at 140 or below,,, and he would have only gone to welter to cash out and get manhandled by SRL and HEarns....
Comment
-
Yeah like there were a bunch of Mayweather's walking around at that time.
Duran lost me when he said Floyd and oscar was a draw.
The thing is this ....every era says the same thing in every sport.
I bet ray Robinson era said that about Duran's era.
Floyds era will say that about future champions.
Just because it was said doesn't mean it's true.
Comment
Comment