Originally posted by r.burgundy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can you be considered an ATG when these are your 10 best wins?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Own3d View PostYou didn't know he had 4 years without a fight? What kind of fan are you?lol living up to your name there! Another vits nuthugger owned. Doesn't even have a clue about Vitali let alone anybody else but godamn you for a hater if you suggest he's not the greatest fighter since Hercules and bruce lee had a love child
Last edited by Daddy T; 08-12-2013, 07:48 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by r.burgundy View Postso take his 10 down to 7.still a longer reign than any norton ever had
im not much a fan at all actually.i just give credit when its due.guy has been dominant
Does it matter about his so-called reign? And "reign" as what exactly? Playing second fiddle to lil bro fighting bum after bum?
VERY impressive huh? Klitschko fans have become accustomed to look at numbers and say, "well, he defended his title 10 times" forgetting to look at the fact that majority of these "defenses" were against guys the top 10 contenders would get crap for fighting.
Briggs, Charr, Sosnowski, Solis, Johnson, Chisora, Gomez, Arreola, Peter and Adamek.
I count 2 actual top 10 fighters, Peter and Adamek. One could make a case for Arreola, but even that's debatable.
Impressive..Last edited by LacedUp; 08-12-2013, 09:27 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by House of Stone View Postlol living up to your name there! Another vits nuthugger owned. Doesn't even have a clue about Vitali let alone anybody else but godamn you for a hater if you suggest he's not the greatest fighter since Hercules and bruce lee had a love child
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostDude you just lost all credibility.
Does it matter about his so-called reign? And "reign" as what exactly? Playing second fiddle to lil bro fighting bum after bum?
VERY impressive huh? Klitschko fans have become accustomed to look at numbers and say, "well, he defended his title 10 times" forgetting to look at the fact that majority of these "defenses" were against guys the top 10 contenders would get crap for fighting.
Briggs, Charr, Sosnowski, Solis, Johnson, Chisora, Gomez, Arreola, Peter and Adamek.
I count 2 actual top 10 fighters, Peter and Adamek. One could make a case for Arreola, but even that's debatable.
Impressive..
im pretty sure most defenses of guys like charr have been mandatories.gomez won a title eliminator,and johnson and arreola were definiitely top 3 contenders.you can criticize these guys all you want,who is out there to fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simurgh View Postjab man, how do you see immediate rematches between vit-byrd and vit-lennox if they ever happened?
What exactly does this fantasy guessing game have to do with Vittles terribly weak resume and 10 best wins though?
Comment
-
[QUOTE=r.burgundy;13641091]Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
what on earth would be the point of a rematch?their was nothing controversial about the 1st fight lol
of course his resume is weak compared to other atg's as the only other atg's who is in the division is his brother,and they will never fight for obvious reasons.
vits has been the wbc champ for 9 going on 10 years.how long was nortons title reign lol?
10 years of dominance is better than 1 shining moment no matter how hard you try to make it otherwise lol
Comment
Comment