Can you be considered an ATG when these are your 10 best wins?

[DreamFighter]

This is the same vladimir that retired Lennox Lewis. The same vladimir that was winning the fight whenvthe ref stopped it and Lewis was done for in two rounds or less. He has a marciano type record. ATG. if not Lewis would wanted a rematch.Name the fighters that he ducked and you opinion will change.

who did wlad duck? Wlad probably hid away from Lewis, the guy you seem to think he ended the career of lol.


not sure how you can end someones career by avoiding them, perhaps its a Planet Klit logic thing where if Klit avoids someone in reality then it means he brutally KOed them to a klittard.

[Poet682006]

This is the same vladimir that retired Lennox Lewis. The same vladimir that was winning the fight whenvthe ref stopped it and Lewis was done for in two rounds or less. He has a marciano type record. ATG. if not Lewis would wanted a rematch.Name the fighters that he ducked and you opinion will change.

Hey ******! Lennox fought Vitali not Wladimir.

[JAB5239]

[[QUOTE]QUOTE=r.burgundy;13630342]

he hasnt missed fighting anybody.you posted a list of 30 guys lol.so by that logic i guess vitali should have 80 something fights lol.you post guys like dimentrenko and chambers,failing to mention that chambers beat dimentrenko and wlad ko'd chambers.so explain how these are viable fight options lol

Everyone on that list was rated in the top 10 at the same time as Vits. I never expected him to fight all of them, but many of them would have been better fights than most of who he did fight.

everybody in the 70's didnt fight each other lol.should i starty with smokin joe who didnt fight lyle,norton,or jimmy young.and before you fix your face to make 1 bad excuse as to why he didnt fight these guys,just remind yourself of the 30 guys you posted that you said vitali missed lol

Yes, lets please start with Frazier. In 37 fights he fought 14 top 10 contenders rated by The Ring. In 47 fights Vits has only fought 8. That means in 10 less fight Frazier fought nearly twice as many contenders.

i seem to recall guys like foreman,and lyle sucking wind after a few rnds also lol.the skill level wasnt much higher lol.deal in facts,not bad opinions.ali was highly skilled,quarry,jimmy young,thats it.everybody else skill level was good to avg

Yes its easy to just pick and choose fights, huh? I pick the first and third Ali-Frazier fights with Norton-Holmes as a kicker. And don't kid yourself, the skillset as a whole on todays contenders stink. Hell, they don't even work the body anymore!

take the best contenders from the 70's and they would still just be contenders in 2012.

Exactly. And todays contenders would instead be journeymen and stiffs. Glad we could find some common ground!

[JAB5239]

so let me get this straight.vit isnt the wbc champ?i could be wrong but i thought he won the belt back in 04 from sanders who ko'd his bro.the wbc is generally the most prized belt.
so its ok for frazier not to fight norton because they are friends but wrong for 2 brothers not to fight.lol ok
they both have fought every top contender their was to fight.should they fight the guys that lose to them.maybe haye who just got dominated will have a dif result against vit.things dont work that way.you lose,its to the back of the line
holmes resume is full of charrs and chisoras.please prove otherwise
kinda like jerry quarry?

Its sad, when a Klit fan can't make a point with one brothers resume he just combines the others into it and problem solved. Sorry bud, but THAT is not the way it works.

[BattlingNelson]

So again. I ask this in post 6 to see if we can get a reasonable discussion going:

Define ATG.

The oft-banned TS decides to ignore my post, which didn’t really surprise me as he has me on his ignorelist (he cannot ignore me though).

But another poster brings it up 150+ posts later:

But in either case, first one would have to define ATG. And how far does ATG stretch to? 1 to 10? 1 to 20? Anything from 1 to 50?
Because I'm sure I can dig up more than a couple names known to be in the upper Top 25 to 50 bracket, that AREN'T better than Vitali, resume wise or talent/skill wise. Which would technically make Vitali an ATG.

So again a clear cut and reasonable question and Jab decides to answer like this:

I think 20 should be the limit. Historically the top 10 are the elite. I think doubling that for history is fair. I think Vits is one of those who just misses the cut.

Clearly the hotheaded and oftbanned historysection mod writes that he thinks that 20 fighters is the cut off for the HW division and that Vitali just misses the cut right? Surely there can be no other way of interpretation. He writes ‘I think’ several times so it is his opinion and not the opinion of someone else.

But so it isn’t.

Because I called him out on it he went to namecalling by calling me, who is a staffmember BTW, an idiot and liar.

He did so because he states that the 20 boxer limit isn’t his opinion but someone elses.

So apparently we still do not know where he ranks Vitali and we don’t know who makes the cut on his list.

#postergonecrazy #oftbannedmodshouldtakeabreak

[BattlingNelson]

I would have to give the edge to Vitali. Floyd Patterson avoided Sonny Liston for a long time, before he and Cus Damato ran out of excuses and got KTFO twice. For the most part of Floyd's reign, a lot of people were speculating on his suspect chin and him avoiding Sonny, so he didn't fight the likes of Folley and Williams.

Not that Vitali ever fought the best either, but he racked up more defensed and never ducked anybody. He just left the best for his brother.

Just for reference, JediHater has Patterson in the top 15 and Vitali is between 50 and 100 which is laughable.

[Poet682006]

Just for reference, JediHater has Patterson in the top 15 and Vitali is between 50 and 100 which is laughable.

Eh, I have Patterson somewhere between 15-20. Too chinny and too weak in the resume department to rate any higher than that.

Poet

[BattlingNelson]

Eh, I have Patterson somewhere between 15-20. Too chinny and too weak in the resume department to rate any higher than that.

Poet

I think that's probably a little too generous on Patterson, but having Vitali some 40-90 places after Floyd is ridiculous.

[Poet682006]

I think that's probably a little too generous on Patterson, but having Vitali some 40-90 places after Floyd is ridiculous.

Yeah, that's a bit of an extreme ranking even going by resumes alone (which I don't do). I have Vitali and Wlad somewhere between 20-25 with Vitali higher than Wlad.

On the other hand I'm pretty sure Jedi ranks him there solely to piss off the Klitlickers. As a general rule, pissing off nuthuggers is never a bad thing :grin9:

Poet

[BattlingNelson]

Yeah, that's a bit of an extreme ranking even going by resumes alone (which I don't do). I have Vitali and Wlad somewhere between 20-25 with Vitali higher than Wlad.

On the other hand I'm pretty sure Jedi ranks him there solely to piss off the Klitlickers. As a general rule, pissing off nuthuggers is never a bad thing :grin9:

Poet

JediHater would say that I'm a klitlicker no doubt. But then again he is not really a poster I read or take seriously.