Really? You're jumping on the exceedingly puerile "you a hater" bandwagon, too?
I'm not familiar with your posting history, but you struck me as an unbiased and thoughtful poster from what I've read from you in this thread. Now I see you painting anybody skeptical of the numbers (y'know, since they were never released) with the broad brush of "hater" and immediately realize you're just another infantile boxing fan who cannot comprehend skepticism or cynicism without immediately jumping to the conclusion that the person in question must have an ulterior motive.
I don't hate Mayweather in the least, and I'm skeptical of the numbers, so my very existence obliterates your piss-poor excuse for a theory.
I'm not familiar with your posting history, but you struck me as an unbiased and thoughtful poster from what I've read from you in this thread. Now I see you painting anybody skeptical of the numbers (y'know, since they were never released) with the broad brush of "hater" and immediately realize you're just another infantile boxing fan who cannot comprehend skepticism or cynicism without immediately jumping to the conclusion that the person in question must have an ulterior motive.
I don't hate Mayweather in the least, and I'm skeptical of the numbers, so my very existence obliterates your piss-poor excuse for a theory.

Comment