So what exactly won Canelo the fight???

[KhalidAMuhammad]

So the Mayweather/"slick boxer" fans are now claiming that pro boxing should be scored based on the amateur system of computerized tag?

Is there a fan base of anything in the world with a lower collective IQ than Floyd fans? Maybe fans of huffing paint thinner, or fans of human crash testing?

[cixthree]

So "perfect scoring" doesn't take into account the damage inflicted by the punches thrown?

Doesn't sound so perfect to me.

Ijt all comes into play, boxing is subjective.
I'm not saying Canelo did not win, but it was damn closer than those cards said

[-Kev-]

Excuse me sir, quit making straw man arguments. I never said that Trout was a B-Hop level fighter. Way to completely ignore the topic at hand...

Nothing, I mean absolutely nothing, that Trout does is comparable to what Hopkins does. The ring generalship you speak of, was non-existent.

Just, no. It doesn't matter what comparison you are making between Hopkins and Trout. There is none whatsoever. Unless you're talking about they are both African American, i'll give you that.

Otherwise, it just looks like you were bringing him up because he's in Cup's avatar, and no other reason. Might as well bring up Rick Grimes in the argument when replying to me. Because that is how it look like what you are doing with Cup.

In the subject of ring gen. [and everything else], there's absolutely no kind of resemblance between Trout and Hopkins.

[Vasyl’s dad]

No, not at all. I didn't fail, I just gave the much more simple answer as to what transpired in that ring, which was visible to every eye watching.

Not some phony esoteric, mambo jambo, would be pseudo nonsense. In plain terms, he outslicked the advertised slick boxer and put him on his ass to boost.

He slipped punches like he was Pernel Whitaker's, less athletic bastard child conceded in Mexico to a white Mexican woman. And he landed clean, visible to the eye punches in spurts. Good enough for a close victory with the added knockdown.

That's all there is to it.

lol. At the moment where he slipped about 5 or 6 punches and he gave a sly grin afterward, it definitely reminded me of Pernell against Oscar. Maybe not as aesthetically pleasing, but you could see the talent was most definitely there.

[cixthree]

Completely wrong. Its about who lands the cleaner punches, not the most.

Thats ur opinion... But again boxing is subjective....
And ur completely wrong. If I land 10 1/2 speed shots to ur 1 hard shot u should lose the round.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Ijt all comes into play, boxing is subjective.
I'm not saying Canelo did not win, but it was damn closer than those cards said

Not a single person has been in dispute of that. At least from what I've seen. I myself had it 114-113.

[cupocity303]

Landed more jabs, sure he did.

Notice the Esotericism. Asking me for "objective analysis" as if I didn't already explain my case. I guess I have to post computer code style paragraphs to qualify.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Thats ur opinion... But again boxing is subjective....
And ur completely wrong. If I land 10 1/2 speed shots to ur 1 hard shot u should lose the round.

Clean punching: “Clean” punches are punches that land on the face/side of the head and the front/side of the torso.


Where does it say anything about quantity? It doesn't. You can land your 10 speed shots, and I can land my one hard shot and knock you down or even out.

So which is more effective?

[-Kev-]

Not a single person has been in dispute of that. At least from what I've seen. I myself had it 114-113.

That's giving Trout too much credit for his 400 jabs IMO. I had 9-3 Canelo.

[cixthree]

Not a single person has been in dispute of that. At least from what I've seen. I myself had it 114-113.

Thats respectable....
But those scores almost made me gag, boxing really needs to be policed. And the irony, it happend in the same place Sweet P got robbed (Aint ISH changed)