Does Floyd Mayweather Jr have a top 5 resume (of the last 25 years)

[IronDanHamza]

Ok I concede Floyd has a better over all resume but beating Arguello twice trumps any of floyds wins easily.

Beating Arguello twice is great in your eyes. Yet, you critisize Mayweather for fighting Marquez at 147, a weight where Marquez actually did something.

Do tell, what did Arguello do at 140 (His 4th weight class) to make that such a great win?

I mean, it was a good win, the first one. But you critisize Mayweather's opposition "Passed prime, moved up in weight" then all of a sudden that's a great win for Pryor? Different set of standards, isn't it?

Any chance of getting that Top 10 list from 03-Present with fighters with a better resume than Mayweather, by the way? I'd love to see it.

[Barry Halls]

1. Michael Spinks
2. Razor Ruddock
3. Tony Tucker
4. Frank Bruno
5. Larry Holmes

Doesn't he mean is Floyds legacy in the top 5 for boxers who were active in the last 25 years as opposed to fights they have fought in the last 25 years?

I'm sure he means the last 25 years of fights.

Otherwise Duran, Hearns, Leonard etc would put both Pac and Floyd off the list.

And it's not like Tysons entire career is stronger than Floyd either. We get to add 2 names to the already quite weak list of wins he has.

Tyson is more about potential than a proven resume.

[SCtrojansbaby]

That's a horrible list. How come fat boy Toney is on that list?

I like Eubank, he's a slick black Brit. but he's resume is not better than FLoyd
Also Lewis should be top 2 on that list.

lol Toney beat McCallum, Eubank beat Benn which is faaaaaaar ahead of anyone Floyd has beaten. But like I said before Donaire and Ward have or are about to pass him too in terms of resume, thats who we should be talking about

[SCtrojansbaby]

Beating Arguello twice is great in your eyes. Yet, you critisize Mayweather for fighting Marquez at 147, a weight where Marquez actually did something.

Mayweather didn't make weight that win is meaningless

[-Lowkey-]

Beating Arguello twice is great in your eyes. Yet, you critisize Mayweather for fighting Marquez at 147, a weight where Marquez actually did something.

Do tell, what did Arguello do at 140 (His 4th weight class) to make that such a great win?

I mean, it was a good win, the first one. But you critisize Mayweather's opposition "Passed prime, moved up in weight" then all of a sudden that's a great win for Pryor? Different set of standards, isn't it?

Any chance of getting that Top 10 list from 03-Present with fighters with a better resume than Mayweather, by the way? I'd love to see it.

Arguello was favourite for the first fight, Arguello was moving up one weight class from his previous bout not two, Pryor made the contracted weight.

Enought reason's?

[PureBoxingCEO]

De la Hoya has the best resume of the last 25 years

[IronDanHamza]

Arguello was favourite for the first fight, Arguello was moving up one weight class from his previous bout not two, Pryor made the contracted weight.

Enought reason's?

Pryor get's credit because he was the underdog but it doesn't change the fact that Arguello was on his last legs and clearly well out of his element a 140.

And what did Arguello do at 140? Nothing.

Marquez has actually done something at 147.


Any chance on that Top 10 list?

[junior gong]

Bumsniff.

[Barry Halls]

De la Hoya has the best resume of the last 25 years

No, because he lost a majority of his big fights.

[junior gong]

In what alternate universe is this a good resume over the last 10 years, the best wins are battle worn Cotto or shot ODLH who else 40 year old Mosley? Zab Judah, JMM jumping up two weight classes......GTFO.

Victoriano Sosa

Phillip Ndou

DeMarcus Corley

Arturo Gatti

Sharmba Mitchell

Zab Judah

Carlos Manuel Baldomir

Oscar De La Hoya

Ricky Hatton

Juan Manuel Marquez

Shane Mosley

Victor Ortiz

Miguel Cotto

Jeez, that looks paper thin. That is weak beer for someone with Floyd's apparent talent. what a waste.