Does Floyd Mayweather Jr have a top 5 resume (of the last 25 years)

[Skittlez]

lol, this is why threads like this turn into **** shows, no1 wants to debate. they just say dumb ****, and refuse to make their point. its def aguable he doesnt but then who would u say has a better resume in the last 25yr span, and i dont really count whitaker because he started boxing outside of the range of that span.

So let's see your top 5?

I might have missed it. Type it again for skittlez.

[jai mari078]

Hell no!!!!!!!!

[Kagami Taiga]

So let's see your top 5?

I might have missed it. Type it again for skittlez.

go re read the thread. slowly this time. smh. they cant make ppl more ******ed than u find on this site, i swear

[Skittlez]

go re read the thread. slowly this time. smh. they cant make ppl more ******ed than u find on this site, i swear

I MADE THIS GREAT THREAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't WANT to reread all that .. JUST LIST IT FOR ME.

[Kagami Taiga]

I MADE THIS GREAT THREAD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't WANT to reread all that .. JUST LIST IT FOR ME.

no thanks, u shouldnt comment on my post if u didnt read my posts before that. smh...

[Skittlez]

no thanks, u shouldnt comment on my post if u didnt read my posts before that. smh...

I found your quote. I was very let down. That wasn't even a ***ing list.


"""
hes somewhee in there, its definitely arguable. whos above him for sure? last 25 years would be holyfield, manny. thats all i can absolutely think of, debatable is roy, b hop maybe lewis"""


That's not a list, that's just a poorly worded quote forcing readers to come to their own conclusions.

You also forgot Whitakker.

[Kagami Taiga]

I found your quote. I was very let down. That wasn't even a ***ing list.


"""
hes somewhee in there, its definitely arguable. whos above him for sure? last 25 years would be holyfield, manny. thats all i can absolutely think of, debatable is roy, b hop maybe lewis"""


That's not a list, that's just a poorly worded quote forcing readers to come to their own conclusions.

You also forgot Whitakker.

its a list. smh. stop it. and u need to reread the quote u quoted earlier in referene to whitaker. smh. whats wrong with u?

[Skittlez]

its a list. smh. stop it. and u need to reread the quote u quoted earlier in referene to whitaker. smh. whats wrong with u?

IT'S NOT A LIST.

The way you wrote it was


hes somewhee in there, its definitely arguable. whos above him for sure? last 25 years would be holyfield, manny. thats all i can absolutely think of, debatable is roy, b hop maybe lewis"



so because you used the word 'arguable' and 'whos above him for sure'?
'debatable is roy b hop lewis' etc

So technically the list can be
Holyfield
Manny
Floyd
Lewis
Roy
Bhop

OR

it can be
Manny
Holyfield
Lewis
B Hop
Whitaker
Roy

LEAVING FLOYD OUT OF THE TOP 5.

Because you said 'debatable' and arguable' WE DON'T KNOW YOUR LIST.


WHAT IS YOUR TOP 5

[Kagami Taiga]

IT'S NOT A LIST.

The way you wrote it was


hes somewhee in there, its definitely arguable. whos above him for sure? last 25 years would be holyfield, manny. thats all i can absolutely think of, debatable is roy, b hop maybe lewis"



so because you used the word 'arguable' and 'whos above him for sure'?
'debatable is roy b hop lewis' etc

So technically the list can be
Holyfield
Manny
Floyd
Lewis
Roy
Bhop

OR

it can be
Manny
Holyfield
Lewis
B Hop
Whitaker
Roy

LEAVING FLOYD OUT OF THE TOP 5.

Because you said 'debatable' and arguable' WE DON'T KNOW YOUR LIST.


WHAT IS YOUR TOP 5

its a list. u see the names i picked above him rite. the other names are debatable sure, but they are all somewhere on the list. u dont like how i worded it, thats fine, but i achieved my goal in typing it. i have arguments for and against each of the other two but at the end, they all make the top five so why the hell does it matter??? they all are in the top 5!smh

[IronDanHamza]

Agreed. By a lot of people's logic Buster Douglas has one of the best resumes over the past 25 years because his win over a prime/undefeated Tyson >>>>> most fighters best win over the past 25 years. And his losses aren't even considered.

That happens a lot.

"Fighter A beat him and that's better than anything fighter B did so therefore Fighter A>>>Fighter B"

Pretty ****** logic.

Ruben Carters win over Emile Griffith is one of THE greatest wins in the history of the sport.

Better than absolutely any single win that Mayweather, Pacquaio, Whitaker, Roy Jones, Holyfield holds and the list goes on and on and on and on.

Would anyone say Ruben Carter is greater than any of those fighters? No, of course not. ****** way to look at it.