Official Adrien Broner vs. Gavin Rees & undercards RbR & Discussion Thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30197
    • 1,346
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #581
    Originally posted by 1PunchKOPOW!
    What agenda? Broner victories consist of smaller guys who he just walks down and stand in front of him. Come talk to me when he fights and beats a mobile guy so I can retract my posts. He failed to bully Quintero and Ponce and look what happened.
    You are **** poster. I mean just absolute ****.

    Small guys like DeMarco huh?

    Comment

    • .:: JSFD26 ::.
      Brawski
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 33329
      • 725
      • 432
      • 44,762

      #582
      Originally posted by mathed
      The speed would cause Broner problems. Khan isn't great but he moves his feet fairly well an Broner is like a box. He fights is a confined manner, if you notice most of his punches come from a centralized position where he throws punches with his elbows tight to his sides and uses his arm from the elbow to the fist to land punches.

      He also has pretty bad footwork and moves in a repetitive, rocking motion that can easily be timed. Khan's in an out motion would allow him to get out of the way before Broner could touch him. Broner's best punch s that uppercut that he also throws with his elbow tucked around the waist line.

      He is just very confined...a fast rangy fighter has a lot of advantages over him.
      I know how Broner fights, I've been calling it for a while. But Khan gets caught in exchanges on the inside too much. One punch is all it would take.

      And that's the reason he's calling Burns out and not Vazquez.

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        BoxingScene Icon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 49449
        • 5,022
        • 269
        • 104,043

        #583
        Originally posted by 1PunchKOPOW!
        What agenda? Broner victories consist of smaller guys who he just walks down and stand in front of him. Come talk to me when he fights and beats a mobile guy so I can retract my posts. He failed to bully Quintero and Ponce and look what happened.
        In fairness, I think it's fair to say he's improved since then.

        Comment

        • M Bison
          Perfect, but you're not
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2012
          • 15677
          • 600
          • 798
          • 32,424

          #584
          Originally posted by 1PunchKOPOW!
          What agenda? Broner victories consist of smaller guys who he just walks down and stand in front of him. Come talk to me when he fights and beats a mobile guy so I can retract my posts. He failed to bully Quintero and Ponce and look what happened.
          I agree on part of him beating guys who he stands in front and provides the easier option of him out powering but he has beat one guy that comes to mind who was bigger than him DeMarco but he did stand in front of him typical Mexican bravado and it just never worked...
          Perhaps we're yet to see Broner to fight a smart technical boxer, I say perhaps incase anyone can correct me.

          Comment

          • ROSS CALIFORNIA
            Tyson fan
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 69864
            • 997
            • 1,956
            • 113,453

            #585
            Rees was a tough little cookie in there. He deserves respect for fighting the way he did tonight. Broner seemed to be having problems with Rees. Maybe it was his hight. Gamboa ****s Broner at this point.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 49449
              • 5,022
              • 269
              • 104,043

              #586
              Originally posted by 1PunchKOPOW!
              I know how Broner fights, I've been calling it for a while. But Khan gets caught in exchanges on the inside too much. One punch is all it would take.

              And that's the reason he's calling Burns out and not Vazquez.
              What's that reason? Honest question.

              Are you implying Burns has a glass chin? Because he really doesn't. Quite the opposite.

              Comment

              • M Bison
                Perfect, but you're not
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2012
                • 15677
                • 600
                • 798
                • 32,424

                #587
                Originally posted by ROSS CALIFORNIA
                Rees was a tough little cookie in there. He deserves respect for fighting the way he did tonight. Broner seemed to be having problems with Rees. Maybe it was his hight. Gamboa ****s Broner at this point.
                Lol you're displaying sarcasm I assume with Gamboa beating Broner...
                Soon as Broner lands on Gamboa it's just about all over for that fight, Gamboa's chin isn't good enough to deal with that.

                Comment

                • .:: JSFD26 ::.
                  Brawski
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 33329
                  • 725
                  • 432
                  • 44,762

                  #588
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  In fairness, I think it's fair to say he's improved since then.
                  Yea, Im pretty tired of hearing that excuse. That's why he's still fighting the same type of guys right? If his handlers ever grow some balls Broner is gonna be in for a rude awakening.
                  Originally posted by Keitha313
                  I agree on part of him beating guys who he stands in front and provides the easier option of him out powering but he has beat one guy that comes to mind who was bigger than him DeMarco but he did stand in front of him typical Mexican bravado and it just never worked...
                  Perhaps we're yet to see Broner to fight a smart technical boxer, I say perhaps incase anyone can correct me.
                  DeMarco was bigger than him? Where? How? DeMarco is a fkin twig. How do you people measure size? Taller doesn't automatically mean bigger.

                  Comment

                  • mathed
                    molṑn labé
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 54551
                    • 2,742
                    • 2,984
                    • 224,675

                    #589
                    Originally posted by 1PunchKOPOW!
                    I know how Broner fights, I've been calling it for a while. But Khan gets caught in exchanges on the inside too much. One punch is all it would take.

                    And that's the reason he's calling Burns out and not Vazquez.
                    Khan gets caught but I think he will be strictly boxing now like he did after the last time he got KO'd for a few fights before he gets sloppy again.

                    Vazquez would be a very tough fight for Broner....if you can move around, he is useless.

                    Comment

                    • Kagami Taiga
                      Generation of Miracles
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 19078
                      • 703
                      • 228
                      • 40,183

                      #590
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                      What's that reason? Honest question.

                      Are you implying Burns has a glass chin? Because he really doesn't. Quite the opposite.
                      whats funny is ppl actually believe vasquez is just vastly superior to burns. both are very good boxers. different style but burns/vasquez is a 50/50 fight. broner fighting either one should be applauded not hated. im confused.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP