Better resume Jmm or Cotto
Collapse
-
-
Man looking at Marquez opponents I'll go with Cotto lol. Katsidas was never that good...Juaraez never even won a belt...Casamyor was shot to **** and Diaz was never that good to me either.Comment
-
Marquez easily. You should also add Norwood, Pacquiao, and John pretty much as well. He should have at the very least one win over Pacquiao, and he beat Norwood and John.
You left Salido, Gainer, and Polo off Marquez' list too. Those are good wins.Comment
-
it's very tempting to quickly say jmm has the better resume. but really, his best performances were officially 2 losses and a draw with pac. let's go by official records shall we? because if not, oscar would suddenly shoot up inside the ATG list with his 'supposed wins' against mosley and trinidad!Comment
-
Nah, those loses to Whitaker, Sturm, and you can even make a case for Quartey would be too much.it's very tempting to quickly say jmm has the better resume. but really, his best performances were officially 2 losses and a draw with pac. let's go by official records shall we? because if not, oscar would suddenly shoot up inside the ATG list with his 'supposed wins' against mosley and trinidad!Comment
-
Comment
-
Heck no. I refuse to accept decisions from crooked judges. Just my opinion though, it doesn't matter anyway because Marquez still has the better resume without the Pac wins.Comment
-
i dont disagree with jmm having the better one, but based on official stats, imo it's not miles away from cotto as some posters here are quick to say.Comment
Comment