lol, what is up with "marquez should have at least 1 win against pacquiao"
What exactly makes people think he "should" have 1 win, because the way i see it, he "should" have 3 losses, as the judge from the first fight admitted he scored it wrong- that is not debatable, it's a fact.
Your biased scorecards mean nothing, if you had marquez winning any of the 3 pacquiao fights, it just means you dont know how to score properly.
That said, Marquez has not beaten anyone of note in his career. He lost to his biggest rival 3 times. Cotto only lost to the greatest of his era once, and even though he didn't see the final bell he did at least hurt pac a little. Cotto, even as pac's leftover, bloodied floyd's nose whereas marquez got shutout cos floyd was too scared to come forward [and even when pac came forward playing into marquez style, pac still disfigured marquez face]
They are close, i admit, on the atg scale, but cotto ranks higher.
lol, what is up with "marquez should have at least 1 win against pacquiao"
What exactly makes people think he "should" have 1 win, because the way i see it, he "should" have 3 losses, as the judge from the first fight admitted he scored it wrong- that is not debatable, it's a fact.
Your biased scorecards mean nothing, if you had marquez winning any of the 3 pacquiao fights, it just means you dont know how to score properly.
That said, Marquez has not beaten anyone of note in his career. He lost to his biggest rival 3 times. Cotto only lost to the greatest of his era once, and even though he didn't see the final bell he did at least hurt pac a little. Cotto, even as pac's leftover, bloodied floyd's nose whereas marquez got shutout cos floyd was too scared to come forward [and even when pac came forward playing into marquez style, pac still disfigured marquez face]
They are close, i admit, on the atg scale, but cotto ranks higher.
JMM has 3 wins over Pac in my book, but then again I dont know how to score...
Comment