Pacquiao doesn't get enough credit for Marquez fights

[MurkaMan]

Actually I didn't, he's an idiot. I stopped reading anything he says awhile back. Just like you and Brother Jay. If I see one of your post is more than 2 sentences, I won't waste my time reading it.

HAHAHA!!!! You read it!

[BuckToothed]

pac wanted the rematch with marquez immediately after the first fight...it was marquez's fault that didn't happen because he priced himself out...and instead decided to fight chris john for less than what he would have got against an immediate rematch with pac.

And who would turn down an Oscar De La Hoya fight soon after Pac's rematch with JMM.

People also forgot that JMM was their first choice after the failed negotiation with Floyd back in January 2010. GBP priced Marquez out of the trilogy by asking 50/50 and OST.

[Bushbaby]

I actually give Pacman his credit in the 1st & 2nd fights. I thought he won. I like Marquez more in the 1st, because not to many people can remain that good after tasting canvas 3 times in 3 minutes.

But the 3rd fight?? Pacman gets no credit from me. He was bigger, faster & stronger yet Marquez outgunned him clearly on pure boxing skill alone & got shafted for his trouble. I have never seen such an astounding performance by such a thoroughly outgunned fighter.

[Brother Jay]

All 3 fights were close and open to interpretation.

No, they weren't.

Just because you say a thing doesn't make it so.

First fight: JMM got dropped three times in one round. After that Pacquiao one maybe 2 rounds. They gave it a draw.

Second fight: Was pretty much the same as the first except there were less knockdowns. They gave it to Pacquiao.

Third fight: Pacquiao maybe, and I'm being generous, won 4 rounds. JMM boxed beautifully. He hit without getting hit for the majority of the fight. He counterpunched like a demon and didn't allow himself to get ****** into trading with Manny whose only chance was getting JMM to trade.

Everyone at ringside agreed before the cards were read that JMM had won. Amir Khan had stated live on PPV that Pacquiao had obviously lost and will have to regroup and come back. Nearly every major writer, blogger, pundit and sportswriter agreed that JMM had won.

There were Filipinos at the fight who admitted on camera that JMM had won and I believe that they would NEVER have done that if it weren't true.

Many of you keep saying that JMM fought boring or moving backwards and that's why he lost.

BULLSHIT.

If JMM were moving backwards, Pacquiao would have caught him by leaping in as he so frequently does. JMM simply moved away from Pacquiao's left and Pacquiao could do NOTHING. Every time Manny landed on JMM's gloves pactards cheered as loudly as they could to make it seem like Manny was actually doing something that he wasn't.

JMM is seen as the better boxer and the winner of that last bout. Real fans and historians don't care about corrupt judges and decisions.

Interpretation implies that it was a close fight. The third was anything but. Neither was the first.

Some of you cling to such bias because its keeps your dreams relevant.

[Brother Jay]

HAHAHA!!!! You read it!

Of course this idiot did.

Everywhere I go he's never far behind trying to make friends or coerce people to make lists for him.

He's an idiot who never actually responds to the issue at hand. He picks a minor point and then argues it to death.

And that's why no one talks to HIM. He's always responding to someone else.

Just laugh at him. He does excel as a clown.

[Brother Jay]

It would have served you better had you not responded... you read it....

^^^^ See what I mean?

Everyone knows he's an clown.

[Stop]

Pac beat Marquez by wide margin. They all want to see him fall from the top spot but it just won't happen.

[hugh grant]

No, they weren't.

Just because you say a thing doesn't make it so.

First fight: JMM got dropped three times in one round. After that Pacquiao one maybe 2 rounds. They gave it a draw.

Second fight: Was pretty much the same as the first except there were less knockdowns. They gave it to Pacquiao.

Third fight: Pacquiao maybe, and I'm being generous, won 4 rounds. JMM boxed beautifully. He hit without getting hit for the majority of the fight. He counterpunched like a demon and didn't allow himself to get ****** into trading with Manny whose only chance was getting JMM to trade.

Everyone at ringside agreed before the cards were read that JMM had won. Amir Khan had stated live on PPV that Pacquiao had obviously lost and will have to regroup and come back. Nearly every major writer, blogger, pundit and sportswriter agreed that JMM had won.

There were Filipinos at the fight who admitted on camera that JMM had won and I believe that they would NEVER have done that if it weren't true.

Many of you keep saying that JMM fought boring or moving backwards and that's why he lost.

BULLSHIT.

If JMM were moving backwards, Pacquiao would have caught him by leaping in as he so frequently does. JMM simply moved away from Pacquiao's left and Pacquiao could do NOTHING. Every time Manny landed on JMM's gloves pactards cheered as loudly as they could to make it seem like Manny was actually doing something that he wasn't.

JMM is seen as the better boxer and the winner of that last bout. Real fans and historians don't care about corrupt judges and decisions.

Interpretation implies that it was a close fight. The third was anything but. Neither was the first.

Some of you cling to such bias because its keeps your dreams relevant.

Ha ha some Pac hating Floyd fans still making it obvious that JMM beating Pac is the only reason they have a reason to exist.
You should concentrate more on the fact that Floyd lost to Castillo rather than Pac beating JMM 3 times.

Stop being desperate for JMM to have beat Pac, why does what JMm do concern u so much? Wish and hope and prey for Floyd to try beat Pac and dont count and rely on JMM so much.

[Mayabang]

He deserves absolutely no credit for the third fight. He shouldn't have won it at all. Should have been a draw or a Marquez victory. Don't see how he won it and I've watched it about 4 times.

ok, can you please explain your logic to me...

"Should have been a DRAW or a Marquez victory"....Huh? So if you think it could've been a 'draw' then you obviously feel it can go either way right? Isn't that the point of a 'draw'? Isn't what you said the same as saying 'draw OR Pac victory'? lol

[MurkaMan]

Of course this idiot did.

Everywhere I go he's never far behind trying to make friends or coerce people to make lists for him.

He's an idiot who never actually responds to the issue at hand. He picks a minor point and then argues it to death.

And that's why no one talks to HIM. He's always responding to someone else.

Just laugh at him. He does excel as a clown.

Thanks Now I kno who the troll is. He actually started with me a few days ago, and I tore thadass up! I didnt realize it was a pattern!