Yep. Manny beat a weaker version of Hatton and manny was on roids too,
There's no arguement who beat the better ricky hatton is there?it was obviously Floyd
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Your 140 and 147 logic has failed... just review Pac vs JMM in 2004, 2008 and 2011.... weight has NOTHING to do with it.. NOW carry on troll and stop being such a flommo...Comment
-
Comment
-
The weight is an important issue IMO.
If Hatton campaigned at 147, he would be a top 10, but never a clear cut top 5, even if he beat collazo for a belt.
IMO even the underrated record was cherry picked. Urango was ok, and a few names, but who was in their prime and were good?
Hatton was exposed for his own cherry picking. Floyd and PAC can be accused of Cherry picking but put them vs B guys and they should win.
Where as if you put hatton Vs Peterson, Khan, Bradley etc... He would lose IMO.Comment
-
Comment
-
Again, just like I said. You guys are giving yourself away as not having been boxing fans for very long at all. The atmosphere and nuthuggery and hype Hatton was getting at that time was insane. You Pinoys are giving yourselves away as total noob fanboys who don't know **** about boxing and weren't even following the sport around May-Hatton.
Secondly I have followed boxing mcn longer.
The only fools who thought Hatton would win in either were Brits and his fans.
24/7 made general fans think he would win. That's what the show is for.
If anyone understands boxing, then weight is freaking important. Weight is a key in boxing.
Sometimes a guy big and a bully in a lower weight simply can't do it going up. Other times, and only to HOF and ATG particularly, they aret affected so much, but still are.
PAC lost speed, and he usually is on the run now. He certainy is more wary of getting hit.
Floyd is a lot slower than 130, and throws a lot less.
Anyway, who can a man who looked pretty poor at 147, then even be said to be at his best when he was a champ at 140. Hatron's team said no more 147 soon after collazo. He refused to rematch collazo.
At 140 hatton may still have cherry picked, but it was his best weight. If anyone here even says 147 was hattons best weight then they simply love floyd too much.
Beating a shot Castillo is on top of the world now huh?Comment
-
Idiots talking about how weigh doesn't matter?
Weren't these idiots saying bow SRL was a WW and Floyd wasn't really.
So how can you look head to head?
They got a big crush on him.Comment
-
i hope people dont say pacquaio fought the better Ricky Hatton because it was at 140.
Ricky Hattons is a fat bast erd, course losing that extra weight made him weaker.
Ricky Hatton at 147 was a beast, handily beat collazo, nearly put floyd on his ass in the first round. was trained by that ****in NUTTA
FREKIN BEAST.
that extra 7 pound was muscle, pure muscle.
im going to sleep, PEACE
LOL, really.Comment
Comment