Who has a better resume at welterweight, Floyd or Pacquiao?

[turbotime]

Floyd by a hair.

[boxer.exposed]

well considering Floyd has a win over Marquez at WW, and Manny has a loss to Marquez at WW should really end this debate quite quickly.

Dont twist the fact. Pac won in a close fight and remember Pac beat younger prime Marquez twice before Floyd in his two best weight divisions without weight cheating him

[jrosales13]

Both their wins over Shane were about even and Floyd fought a better Shane. And no beating Clottey and Marg are not good wins. Cotto is highly overrated and never won a belt that wasn't vacant, besides beating a one legged ***.

So F'ing what? That's one of the most overrated criticism one can give Cotto.

[Johnwoo8686]

Sure, but Pac fought Mosley, Cotto, and Margarito.. To erase any of that bull**** triangle theory of yours..You know what's even funny Pac has only been a WW for 3 years, while Floyd has been in that weight since 2006.. Oh, and Floyds move to WW has been gradual, while Pac had one fight each at LW, LWW in a span of a year before moving up and settling to WW after having been a featherweight...

LOL how many times are you clowns going to re edit your posts. Seriously, its like you guys have a brainfart every 5 seconds . That extra nonsense you posted in no way means Pacquiao has a better resume at welterweight than Floyd. Like I said Floyd fought more welterweights, beat more champions at welterweight, and beat more number 1s. Pacquiao hasn't defeated a welterweight champion since the Cotto fight and that fight wasn't even at 147!

[BG_Knocc_Out]

Considering the circumstances, Manny by a mile.

Mayweathers resume at 147:
Ortiz
Mosley
Mitchell
Baldomir
Judah
Hatton
DLH

Pacquiaos resume at 147:
DLH
Clottey
Margarito (150)
Cotto
Mosley

In the fashion that Pacquiao won, he didn't just shut them out, he absolutely destroyed them and beat them up. They had no chance at all and they were notable offensive fighters (some past it). But nonetheless, Pacquaio fought offensively to shut out offensive fighters without a sc****. Mayweather fought defensively to shut out (some?) majorly offensive fighters (some at a lower quality) and had some minor troubles along the way.
And the fighters that they share through resume, Pacquiao clearly won in a much better fashion, in my opinion. And please, don't give me that terrible argument about the opponents being left-overs. Mosley already had losses. So did DLH. Hatton clearly had enough confidence, coming into the fight through the Lazcano and Malignaggi wins, to believe that he would win.

[jrosales13]

Considering the circumstances, Manny by a mile.

Mayweathers resume at 147:
Ortiz
Mosley
Mitchell
Baldomir
Judah
Hatton
DLH

Pacquiaos resume at 147:
DLH
Clottey
Margarito (150)
Cotto
Mosley

In the fashion that Pacquiao won, he didn't just shut them out, he absolutely destroyed them and beat them up. They had no chance at all and they were notable offensive fighters (some past it). But nonetheless, Pacquaio fought offensively to shut out offensive fighters without a sc****. Mayweather fought defensively to shut out (some?) majorly offensive fighters (some at a lower quality) and had some minor troubles along the way.
And the fighters that they share through resume, Pacquiao clearly won in a much better fashion, in my opinion. And please, don't give me that terrible argument about the opponents being left-overs. Mosley already had losses. So did DLH. Hatton clearly had enough confidence, coming into the fight through the Lazcano and Malignaggi wins, to believe that he would win.

Do we not know what WW resume means?

And, why is JMM left out?

[mikemurni]

LOL how many times are you clowns going to re edit your posts. Seriously, its like you guys have a brainfart every 5 seconds . That extra nonsense you posted in no way means Pacquiao has a better resume at welterweight than Floyd. Like I said Floyd fought more welterweights, beat more champions at welterweight, and beat more number 1s. Pacquiao hasn't defeated a welterweight champion since the Cotto fight and that fight wasn't even at 147!

Lol.. Champions meaning Judah, Baldo, and Ortiz...lol.. You are comparing to reall WW's like Cotto, Mosley, and Marg..

[BG_Knocc_Out]

Do we not know what WW resume means?

And, why is JMM left out?

My bad, but why don't you focus on the entirety of the post rather than being critical on small errors you could easily throw over your shoulder.

[jrosales13]

My bad, but why don't you focus on the entirety of the post rather than being critical on small errors you could easily throw over your shoulder.

Because, those "small errors" actually affect their whole resume.

[Johnwoo8686]

Do we not know what WW resume means?

And, why is JMM left out?

Dont you see man? Putting JMM in there would completely mess up their agenda. Acknowledging that Pacquiao's toughest fight at welterweight was against a past prime lightweight is just an embarrassing admission lol. And these guys are completely ignoring the fact that Mayweather fought more current champions at welterweight than Pacman did.