Pac-Floyd is a totally different matchup from Pac-JMM

[The Big Dunn]

you're free to add any of your observation. i'm just pointing out that it's a totally different matchup so i don't see the connection that other people does...nough said.

I agree. JMM's lack of reach and speed are the reasons jmm hasn't beaten manny but are the reasons, alomg with balance, I believe floyd beats manny.

[brick wall]

It's almost exactly the same, Floyd being the best counterpuncher ever, way better than Marquez. Floyd will annihilate Pac period.

[brick wall]

A true brick wall. You dont believe water is wet either huh?

i did not create this thread to defend it against fanatics like you so shut the **** up.

[brick wall]

Ok, so JMM might throw more punches than Floyd in his counter-punching.

But do you think Floyd is a better or worse matchup for Pac and why?

try reading between the lines if you can.

[-Johannes-]

How's JMM the better counterpuncher?

[BoxingGenius27]

try reading between the lines if you can.

Relax buddy, stop getting so defensive. I was asking a serious question. I don't want to assume anything.

[brick wall]

You don't see the connection because you're rooting for Pacquiao and you don't want to see the connection or draw the obvious conclusions. Yes, Mayweather will be a totally different matchup for Pacquiao than Marquez was. Mayweather is bigger(in every way), faster, stronger, younger, a better counterpuncher, a more accurate puncher overall, who's more technically sound with much better defense.

ok

[thatnickuh]

This. I expect Floyd to pound that midget.

Good luck my man.

[brick wall]

How's JMM the better counterpuncher?

i thought i already explained that

[thatnickuh]

ok

Don't even know why you made this thread. You're a mental mmidget who's incapable of intelligent debate, hence this elementary-school level reply. I just wanted to expose that yet again.