Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vitali Klitschko has lost fewer rds than ANY boxing champion in the history of boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Money Shot View Post
    The most amazing thing is he took four years off from injury and came back aged 37 even better. The Lewis cut will always haunt him but the man was winning that fight, and would win it now if he fought the same Lewis today. Lewis's record is not as good anyway, two no debate KO losses and less KO's in championship fights. If Vitali had stayed retired he would be rated under Lewis, but not now.
    Have you had a **** on the head recently?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
      Believe it or not when you write absurd things over and over it's gonna shock ppl into remembering it. Why don't you acknowledge that Lewis beat him fair and square and stop making hypothetical situations where if he wasn't cut, he wouldn't have lost blah blah bull****. If Ali never went to prison and turned up everynight in the shape he was against Cleaveland Williams, he would have never lost a match, but he didn't, his body didn't hold out that long and it ended up failing him just like vitali against Lewis. Acknowledge that then start talking bout the haters.
      Right, Ali would have been undefeated because he would have went to war and probably been killed. The coward he is , he didn't go when he was drafted. Too much of a p*ss to fight for the country that made him rich and made him an icon. That's the role model you idiots hold so dearly. You should be ashamed. Vitali not only is a respectful countryman, dedicated to his homeland, he is an active politician while at the same time a pro fighter and has a doctors degree. Did Ali even ever have a normal high school diploma?

      Show respect where it is due. What's not to like about the Klitschko's anyways? Beside their skin hue?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by paulf View Post
        What? Joe Mesi is 36-0. How can you say Vitali is the best when he lost? Joe Mesi is clearly the greatest heavyweight since Marciano.
        Maybe you guys don't understand that Vitali has been winning and defending world titles since 2000. There's a big difference between that and beating club fighters.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Superflo777 View Post
          Pathetic how the one is saying Vitali was tuned up by Sanders. He took one good punch from Sanders in the second round (I believe) and backed away for about 5 seconds, and besides that, destroyed Sanders and dominating every round. Also laughing at one saying Chris Byrd was the second best fighter Vitali ever fought, and the other guy saying Vitali is only fighting overweight tomato cans. So Thomasz Adamek is an overweight tomato can?
          Yea, trying to get these guys to accept reality is like talking to a brick wall sometimes. I just try and ignore the really ****** ones. It makes this site bearable.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mr. Invincible View Post
            For the record, tampons don't bleed. Just saying.

            Also, LL got sparked out twice. I would rather take Vitali's losses.
            They were using tampons in the corner to stop Vitali's bleeding, thats a fact.

            Vitali's losses are worse because they are unavenged. And he has yet to prove he can beat a B class opponent. Its all fat guys and slow-bloated cruiserweights.

            He wanted no part of a slick boxer like Byrd and sneakily avoided a rematch with him from 2000-2005. Ive yet to see Vitali beat anyone who could be considered good or great.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Sage84 View Post
              Have you had a **** on the head recently?
              I would pick today's Vitali over any LL there ever was or could be. He's that damn good at 40 in my opinion.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Joeyzagz View Post
                They were using tampons in the corner to stop Vitali's bleeding, thats a fact..
                Well I suppose you would be able to identify a tampon easier than I, I can admit that.

                Originally posted by Joeyzagz View Post
                Vitali's losses are worse because they are unavenged. And he has yet to prove he can beat a B class opponent. Its all fat guys and slow-bloated cruiserweights..
                Huh? Both of Vitali's losses came on injuries when he was winning the fights comfortably. I am glad you mentioned the 'unavenged' thing because that makes one wonder why Lennox chose to walk out on a career high payday and duck a rematch to avoid giving Vitali the chance to get that vengence. The Byrd fight was avenged by Wlad while Vitali healed and it was obvious Byrd couldn't beat Vit in a million years barring injury. So that rematch was pointless. At least Rahman and McCall had the balls to fight Lewis again.

                Originally posted by Joeyzagz View Post
                He wanted no part of a slick boxer like Byrd and sneakily avoided a rematch with him from 2000-2005. Ive yet to see Vitali beat anyone who could be considered good or great.
                I covered the Byrd thing above. No rematch needed. Anyone with brains knows that. And wasn't Solis, who was supposed to be some great up and coming fighter supposed to be the guy to have a shot @ Vitali? That's right, after he was dispatched in 1 rd he became a bum who never had a shot. It's always that way. The next guy is good until they get destroyed. Typical critics BS.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jimmy1569 View Post
                  If ONLY his opponents actually did stop him while he was ahead on the cards. Both his dfeats were stopped by doctor intervention in between rds while his opponents were losing handily>>> those are the facts. His opponents had NOTHING to do with the stoppages. Both losses were due to dr's opinions ONLY. in the Byrd fight.. Dr. Klitschko's opinion was that his career & future was more important than jeapordizing his shoulder further..


                  In the Lewis bout... it was a doctor's opinion Klitschko couldn't see accurately... both bouts were NOT stopped because Klitschko couldn't defend himself as he was holding his own in the last seconds of both bouts.. there was NOTHING he was submitting or anything to point to where he wasn't ABLE to defend himself... both bouts were stopped because of physical injuries incurred during the bouts. BOTH bouts he was able to continue if need be.. his opponents were bystanders when they were handed gift W'S... in between rds.


                  BOTH DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THEY WON OR THAT THE FIGHT WAS GOING TO END.... ALL THEY KNEW IS THAT THEY WERE TRAILING HEAVILY ON THE SCORECARDS & NEEDED A MIRACLE KNOCKOUT TO PULL OUT THE VICTORY... THE FACTS ARE THEY GOT THAT MIRACLE KO & IT WAS MOST UNEXPECTED TO THE BOTH OF THEM (bYRD & lEWIS). THE FACT THAT LEWIS WAS EVEN MORE FINISHED THAN vITALI despite physical appearances is lost in all of this.... Both ensuing bogus dfeats were dealt with as Vitali's little brother destroyed Byrd for 20 more rds & Lewis never stepped in the ring again & his last flashback in the ring is the towering Klitschko handing him his a$$ on a platter
                  OMG.........He hit HIMSELF??????????

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Joeyzagz View Post
                    He wanted no part of a slick boxer like Byrd and sneakily avoided a rematch with him from 2000-2005. Ive yet to see Vitali beat anyone who could be considered good or great.
                    Yeah, Byrd was way too slick and fast for Vitali, avoiding all shots from him. Only losing on all three scorecards heavily, but that's OK in Germany, right?

                    I ask you, if Chris Byrd was such a good fighter and worthy of a rematch, why didn't he step up himself and became mandatory WBC challenger to face Vitali? Maybe he didn't want the rematch himself? Ever thought about that, or are you the guy that said Byrd was the second best fighter Vitali ever faced?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mr. Invincible View Post
                      I would pick today's Vitali over any LL there ever was or could be. He's that damn good at 40 in my opinion.
                      Based on punch-drunk Adamek? lol

                      You do realize that Vitali once had the speed and power to take guys out in less than 3 rounds? Now he spends 10 rounds tripping on his own feet trying to break a bloated, nub cruiserweight.

                      Vitali does not have 1 punch power anymore. If 2003 vitali couldnt floor Lennox, the 40 year old version isnt doing any better. You forget that Lennox has an 84 reach. On a bad day Lennox is going to connect at 46% because he just has superior range.

                      Lennox does NOT have to give his best effort to beat Vitali. I know thats hard for you to hear but its the truth. Vitali has to go 100% with 2 years of preparation to even compete.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP