I don't see the point of your post. The event happened and I have the magazine in my possession. But you've made me think. You must be right about the date of the issue and test because I think that Boxing Illustrated started only around the late 50's or early 60's. I may have confused the 1950 date, not at all impossible when going from memory of 50 years ago. I suppose you looked it up on the internet. I brought Nat Fleischer into it because I recalled reading maybe in RING that he had been present when the wraps were put on and he testified at some sort of hearing that they were fine. I can't remember who wrapped them. I think it was his trainer, not Kearns.
The facts however are correct, and by the way, you reminded me of another thing I'd forgotten. They did bake the wraps for about half an hour, and Williams did give I think 4 punches. But I do recall reading somewhere, (perhaps in RING or BOXING), that Williams said that he'd felt they crumbled after the first punch. He was, along with Sonny Liston the hardest puncher in the game at that time.
Thanks for the correction.
The facts however are correct, and by the way, you reminded me of another thing I'd forgotten. They did bake the wraps for about half an hour, and Williams did give I think 4 punches. But I do recall reading somewhere, (perhaps in RING or BOXING), that Williams said that he'd felt they crumbled after the first punch. He was, along with Sonny Liston the hardest puncher in the game at that time.
Thanks for the correction.
Comment