Comments Thread For: Hopkins' Trainer: Marquez, a Better Fighter Than Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • letsgobrady
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 6274
    • 126
    • 11
    • 12,670

    #51
    what happened to the thread with tweets from boxers that all thought manny lost?

    Comment

    • djtmal
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 13164
      • 1,294
      • 11
      • 39,097

      #52
      Originally posted by SekondzOut
      Naz is telling the truth....waiting for the Pac crew to come through and start b!tching like the b!tches they've been acting like as of late!!
      yo secondzout whaddup my dude...you still diggin in jokers grills i see...lol

      Comment

      • djtmal
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 13164
        • 1,294
        • 11
        • 39,097

        #53
        Originally posted by SekondzOut
        use that negative energy to bash the congressman for ducking Floyd....tell him yall on the forums sounding and looking ******....Wackaman need to come to yall rescue
        yo i'm ridin' wit you on this one dude...coach roach is poached...lol

        Comment

        • Porter's Dad
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 6831
          • 659
          • 84
          • 19,977

          #54
          I wish ****m would stop trying to convince us that Shane laid a blueprint down. Running, surviving, and losing all 12 rounds isn't a blue print. I don't know if he's trying to salvage something from that goddawful fight but he needs to stop trying to convince us he saw something no-one else did.

          Good footwork, good defence, and aggressive counter-punching as the way to beat Manny was already laid down by Erik and JMM before.

          Comment

          • madsweeney
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 4551
            • 508
            • 298
            • 14,237

            #55
            Originally posted by Ottke's Twin
            I wish ****m would stop trying to convince us that Shane laid a blueprint down. Running, surviving, and losing all 12 rounds isn't a blue print. I don't know if he's trying to salvage something from that goddawful fight but he needs to stop trying to convince us he saw something no-one else did.

            Good footwork, good defence, and aggressive counter-punching as the way to beat Manny was already laid down by Erik and JMM before.
            Truth!


            We all knew JMM was the better boxer/technician that's why it was insane for Pac to try to box him like the bigger/slower guys he's been fighting. He should have stuck to his strengths which was his explosive/buzzsaw nature. he did it in a few spurts and those where the times he looked best in the fight. JMM was smart for finally not trying to pressure Pac, Naz was on point about that dynamic of their fights.

            Comment

            • chardrnm
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 361
              • 9
              • 0
              • 7,890

              #56
              Now they know how to beat Pacquiao. Simply by stepping on his lead foot to disrupt his rhythm and speed. See video http://********/4VRQms5hdMU

              Comment

              • Check_hooks
                The Don of NSB
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 12099
                • 966
                • 1,875
                • 25,959

                #57
                Nazeem is very close to Shane, he probably wont admit it but hes pissed that Pac embarrased him and ****ted on his legacy therefore hes bias

                He favors runners cuz thats all shane and jmm did cuz they damn sure didn't out throw, outland or land the harder shots

                Comment

                • LeadUppercut
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 13387
                  • 305
                  • 869
                  • 13,720

                  #58
                  Originally posted by KillerB
                  Do you think Marquez could beat Cotto or Margarito?
                  I think that Marquez would have KTFO the cracked-egg version of Hatton that Pac fought..... I know that Marquez would have KTFO the Diaz that Pac fought..... I am absolutely positive that Marquez would have KTFO the old shrink-wrapped Hoya that Pac fought..... and dude, just fkn stop it, the guys I just mentioned were NO CHALLENGE AT ALL for Pac, and would have been beaten by most of the top guys in the division that they fought in.

                  The well-faded, shop-worn, no-stamina, 145lb version of Cotto ?

                  Yep, Marquez would have beaten him as well, by unanimous decision, although I can see Cotto providing different problems for Marquez in that fight..... and Margarito? The fact that you even mentioned him shows where you are at.

                  I have a question for you......

                  How the *** could Margarito possibly beat Marquez ?

                  Serious question..... HOW ?

                  Come on

                  Comment

                  • LeadUppercut
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 13387
                    • 305
                    • 869
                    • 13,720

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Ugh!
                    :browraise:
                    what are you crying about?

                    pacquiao is a better fighter, marquez is a better boxer
                    what's the problem?
                    Your problem is this, you mentioned two things, a boxer, and a fighter.....

                    Well, one ranks significantly higher than the other

                    " fighters " or punchers, w/e..... exist to make boxers look good.

                    Uneducated sluggers deserve to get KTFO, educated sluggers deserve what Pac got last Saturday

                    As I said, the name of the game is boxing son, not hitting, and traditionally only the very best sluggers can compete with practitioners of the sweet science..... they usually require a "special" intangible to compete at the top level, like Pac's speed, or Maidana's fortitude...... and they usually lose against top boxers.

                    Just saying.....

                    Comment

                    • LeadUppercut
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 13387
                      • 305
                      • 869
                      • 13,720

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Bushbaby
                      Marquez is the greater fighter. All you need to do to realize that is look at the third fight. Find one advantage that Marquez had going in, (not in the fight itself), but going in. Every advantage Marquez had was in the fight itself. That's why he's the better fighter.
                      There is absolutely nothing to discuss here......

                      The reason why Pac got touched up by a 38yo lightweight, is because the 38yo lightweight is a better fighter/boxer/whatever.

                      And the point is this, how the *** is Manny ranked P4P, when he will not fight the top guys, and he uses catch-weights?

                      Why would a genuine P4P fighter require a catch-weight?

                      Marquez P4P #1.

                      3-0.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP