what happened to the thread with tweets from boxers that all thought manny lost?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hopkins' Trainer: Marquez, a Better Fighter Than Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
-
-
I wish ****m would stop trying to convince us that Shane laid a blueprint down. Running, surviving, and losing all 12 rounds isn't a blue print. I don't know if he's trying to salvage something from that goddawful fight but he needs to stop trying to convince us he saw something no-one else did.
Good footwork, good defence, and aggressive counter-punching as the way to beat Manny was already laid down by Erik and JMM before.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ottke's Twin View PostI wish ****m would stop trying to convince us that Shane laid a blueprint down. Running, surviving, and losing all 12 rounds isn't a blue print. I don't know if he's trying to salvage something from that goddawful fight but he needs to stop trying to convince us he saw something no-one else did.
Good footwork, good defence, and aggressive counter-punching as the way to beat Manny was already laid down by Erik and JMM before.
We all knew JMM was the better boxer/technician that's why it was insane for Pac to try to box him like the bigger/slower guys he's been fighting. He should have stuck to his strengths which was his explosive/buzzsaw nature. he did it in a few spurts and those where the times he looked best in the fight. JMM was smart for finally not trying to pressure Pac, Naz was on point about that dynamic of their fights.
Comment
-
Nazeem is very close to Shane, he probably wont admit it but hes pissed that Pac embarrased him and ****ted on his legacy therefore hes bias
He favors runners cuz thats all shane and jmm did cuz they damn sure didn't out throw, outland or land the harder shots
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillerB View PostDo you think Marquez could beat Cotto or Margarito?
The well-faded, shop-worn, no-stamina, 145lb version of Cotto ?
Yep, Marquez would have beaten him as well, by unanimous decision, although I can see Cotto providing different problems for Marquez in that fight..... and Margarito? The fact that you even mentioned him shows where you are at.
I have a question for you......
How the *** could Margarito possibly beat Marquez ?
Serious question..... HOW ?
Come on
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ugh! View Post:browraise:
what are you crying about?
pacquiao is a better fighter, marquez is a better boxer
what's the problem?
Well, one ranks significantly higher than the other
" fighters " or punchers, w/e..... exist to make boxers look good.
Uneducated sluggers deserve to get KTFO, educated sluggers deserve what Pac got last Saturday
As I said, the name of the game is boxing son, not hitting, and traditionally only the very best sluggers can compete with practitioners of the sweet science..... they usually require a "special" intangible to compete at the top level, like Pac's speed, or Maidana's fortitude...... and they usually lose against top boxers.
Just saying.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bushbaby View PostMarquez is the greater fighter. All you need to do to realize that is look at the third fight. Find one advantage that Marquez had going in, (not in the fight itself), but going in. Every advantage Marquez had was in the fight itself. That's why he's the better fighter.
The reason why Pac got touched up by a 38yo lightweight, is because the 38yo lightweight is a better fighter/boxer/whatever.
And the point is this, how the *** is Manny ranked P4P, when he will not fight the top guys, and he uses catch-weights?
Why would a genuine P4P fighter require a catch-weight?
Marquez P4P #1.
3-0.
Comment
Comment