Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hopkins' Trainer: Marquez, a Better Fighter Than Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Hey BPP , why did you delete my thread? It's not my fault I beat you to it. I didn't even post the link.you guys are really nuts about these stories.that was lame.again it wasn't my fault you wanted to post the same thing.I didn't know.

    Comment


    • #42
      Te way JMM boxes he's a few rungs up the ladder frpm hop who's way over-rated...

      Comment


      • #43
        and its the plain truth after 36 rounds Juan manuel marquez has Proven, proven hes the better fighter of the 2,its not an opinion its a fact,naz is speaking some truth rt there good article.who in thei right mind would want to see pac beat mayweather from pillar to post???? pac has been exposed where are all you *******s that were saying pac was top 5 goat?? better than duran leonard my ass!!!hes not in chavez league or duran at all!!!!!!I cant even rank this dude with delahoya cuz delahoya fought much better opposition.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by tusc1976 View Post
          Ok, for one, Marquez fought better than he fought in the first two bouts w/Pacquiao , so AGE had nothing to do with it. He did not fight like a man who's burned out or who's in his decline....he was impressive so give the man his proper credit. Welter or Lightweight, Marquez will always give Pacquiao fits because he's a better technical fighter than Pacquiao. I'm sorry to ruin your "Uh-Huh moment" but it has never been a secret that JMM has Pac's number.
          i hate tell you but your wrong jmm is not prime its his skill that keeps him in the game skills that pac will never have.any technician will school pacs one dimensional assss thier is a reason why they cherry picked thier oppents the way they did and if you cant see that you are just as one dimensional as your hero pac hahahaha

          Comment


          • #45
            the Pacquiao that JMM fought last week was not even close to being a 'great' fighter -- we saw an undertrained, unfocused fighter who spent much of the time skittering around the ring like an animated bobblehead doll -- who missed a million opportunities to land lead punches -- who rarely engaged effectively during exchanges and seemed to have no Plan B when Plan A was clearly not working....

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by KillerB View Post
              Do you think Marquez could beat Cotto or Margarito?
              Originally posted by BoZz View Post
              He would beat the version of cotto pac has beat...the version of cotto pac fought was a bad version..cotto came in at catch weight...cotto got whooped by margarito...cotto came to the fight with no proper coach..sandiago wasn't even ready to coach an amateur let alone cotto..he had no plan B in the fight..pac fought the worst version of cotto..everyone knows that.

              Pac also fought the worst version of margarito...marga lost to mosley big time...marga has never been the same since they discovered his plaster wraps..he also came in at a catch weight..in the fight he looked very bad...he was slow and drained..every time he threw the jab it was so slow...

              Why didn't pac fight margarito after he whooped cotto??

              Why didn't pac fight cotto after cotto beat mosley?? And of course we all know that pac would never fight them if it wasn't at a catch weight...he fought them at their worst at catch weight..and they made him look good..but 2 days ago we saw the real pac..he got whooped by JMM who also came in at a catch weight but still managed to whoop the cherry picker pac.
              Well said. JMM should fight the loser (hell even the winner since those two are gonna go to war) of Cotto/Marg 2 at a catchweight, and show everyone he can also get an opportunistic win.
              Last edited by Doc Holliday; 11-15-2011, 12:57 PM.

              Comment


              • #47
                Naz have a good point especially citing that Ariza used God name in this bout of His inability to change the result of the game, is totally wrong indeed! But Naz has a serious allegation on Pac-Mosley fights, because in my understanding, the Mosley fight with Pac beforehand was sold(?)

                Comment


                • #48
                  It's funny that Naazim mentions when Lampley said all Pac used to do was "Jab, jab, left hand" and then soon as he finished saying it Pac did that combo twice, because I just re-watched this afternoon and noticed that!

                  Funny stuff because you see the fighters actions contradicting the things you are being told to believe.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    ****m comments on mannys right hand in the article and i have been sayin the same thing i don't see manny really landing the right hand in the marquez fight i also don't really see manny landing the right hand in the mosley fight yet people like to claim how good manny is with his right hand now but in his last 2 fights where his opponents have been circling to the left manny has not been landing right hands

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by drunken_master
                      Richardson also forgot to say that Marquez is also better than his man Hopkins cause he doesn't roll around like a BI TCH crying on the ground faking an injury.
                      use that negative energy to bash the congressman for ducking Floyd....tell him yall on the forums sounding and looking ******....Wackaman need to come to yall rescue

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP