Keith Kizer: "Mayweather was AGAINST petitioning the commision for OSDT"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pasawayako
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 15348
    • 639
    • 194
    • 151,963

    #101
    It seems like the *****s doesn't want the better drug test at all, again they're expose that all they want is only what's better for floyd not for boxing.

    Comment

    • V.WEBB
      CBVM
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 14327
      • 621
      • 174
      • 21,453

      #102
      Originally posted by Toyman
      So that clearly means that once they had agreed to everything (as per ODH) mayweather went on vacation... yet pacquiao is ducking? I implore you - think about it some more, it's not that hard to see.
      LOL. I can't help but laugh at your posts. And this will be final response to this. In the summer of 2010, Manny was still requesting a cut off, a 14 day one when he knew that Mayweather wanted full testing with no cut offs. Well, why did Mayweather now want full testing, you are asking yourself? Because that was the original protocol of the testing ANYWAYS and the original 14 day offer was made....get this...in a last ditch effort to save the fight, however, Manny rejected that offer and fought Clottey to the cheers of a lot of his fans... nothing you say or what anyone else says that will change that.



      Originally posted by Toyman
      the best possible agency? the one that failed to catch some olympians?
      Uh....yea. It is a much better agency than the one that failed to catch Shane Mosley. And please, there really isn't any use in arguing who has the better testing between the two.

      Originally posted by Toyman
      Surely, NSAC knows what drugs to test for with proper funding, and you conveniently forget mayweather was perfectly fine with even NSAC's standard test until December 2009 (that's right, as late as september 2009 it was still perfectly fine!)
      I didn't forget nothing. Floyd wanted more stringent drug testing. Simple as that. Again, what's the issue?


      Originally posted by Toyman
      Why bring in another agency to do the testing, when the same commission that was testing you for the last 15 years was fine, and is now willing to upgrade their test for your fight?
      Really dude, really? Man, did you read ANYTHING I've said? This has already been addressed in my previous posts.


      Originally posted by Toyman
      And you think NSAC does not actually know how to do one? Give them the funding, they know how to do it. USADA is surely the best, even marion jones passed their tests.
      LOL. Here is where you are wrong, buddy. Don't just sprout off and not know what you're talking about. Marion Jones didn't do the USADA testing when she won all those golds in the 2000 Sydney Olympics. Because USADA didn't get started until AFTER the Olympics of 2000. Then, when they tested her in the 04 Olympic games....she came home medal-less...again, think about it...and do your research.


      Originally posted by Toyman
      Lol thats just ****** and you know it is!

      Pacquiao asked mayweather to take the nsac's unlimited blood/urine test and mayweather wanted none of it.


      Originally posted by Toyman
      Perhaps you should listen to yourself:

      Pac asked mayweather to take NSAC test, but agreed to unlimited urine testing on mayweather test + a blood test with 14 day cutoff incl. a test right after the fight.

      Mayweather outright refused Pac's test.

      And yet, it's pac's fault....hmmmm
      Yea..we're done here.


      Originally posted by Toyman
      I reiterate:

      Why use USADA when the NSAC was completely fine with mayweather until 2009? USADA has been known to let even an olympic gold medalist PED user pass their blood test.
      I addressed this above, learn to do some research before posting.

      Comment

      • pasawayako
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 15348
        • 639
        • 194
        • 151,963

        #103
        come on floyd take the new nsac test.

        Comment

        • Wapacman
          Banned
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Dec 2010
          • 550
          • 45
          • 24
          • 716

          #104
          Originally posted by mrjoeblive
          in the first negotiations floyd offered a 14 day cut off which pac shot down and wanted a 24 day cut off. it seems as though you are tainting the evidence to make your point. and as you know pac walked away from the table and had already signed to fight clottey. so the first negotiations were not even on the up and up. arum used floyd to raise pacs profile and it worked.
          I was waiting for someone to point this out!!

          Comment

          • Kenny MF Powers
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 2027
            • 246
            • 1,043
            • 8,828

            #105
            Originally posted by pasawayako
            come on floyd take the new nsac test.
            What new nsac test?

            Comment

            • peyk-peyk
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 9514
              • 5,060
              • 10,032
              • 38,001

              #106
              All problems had been resolved except for one thing, that Floyd needs to take the PACQUIAO TEST!

              Comment

              • pasawayako
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 15348
                • 639
                • 194
                • 151,963

                #107
                Originally posted by Toyman
                oh man....you didn't read it did you?

                I will make it as clear as can be: Arum and Scahefer asked the NSAC if they would be willing to do the unlimited blood/urine testing.

                NSAC said yes.

                Schaefer said yes.

                Arum said yes.

                Pacquiao said yes.

                Mayweather said no.

                Can you spot the difference?
                Big question? Why floyd is ducking his own style of testing?

                Comment

                • dldwizard
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2011
                  • 262
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  • 6,298

                  #108
                  at *****s foaming at the mouth and grasping at straw in their quest to defend their contradictory man-god.. must be pretty fscking hard and tiring at the same time..

                  does kizer+usada having a lover's quarrel with floyd? why is kizer divulging these facts?
                  Last edited by dldwizard; 10-12-2011, 09:02 PM.

                  Comment

                  • John Barron
                    BIG LEAGUE GUY
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 9338
                    • 865
                    • 170
                    • 49,338

                    #109
                    here comes the pinoy lounge cornball crew to clean up after toyman.

                    Comment

                    • Carpe Diem
                      Seize the day
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 15986
                      • 1,219
                      • 981
                      • 44,413

                      #110
                      Originally posted by pasawayako
                      It seems like the *****s doesn't want the better drug test at all, again they're expose that all they want is only what's better for floyd not for boxing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP