Who has Muhammad Ali beating that makes people think he stand a chance against WK

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • prinzemanspopa
    queenmanspopa
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 2714
    • 356
    • 207
    • 9,287

    #161
    Originally posted by The_Expert
    this is pretty much how the Ali vs. Wladimir fight would have been



    Ali would dance circles arround Wlad like a little monkey until Wlad gets close and lands one of his power punches.



    Ya dun goofed,son.

    Comment

    • The_Expert
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jul 2011
      • 203
      • 18
      • 26
      • 239

      #162
      Originally posted by prinzemanspopa
      Ya dun goofed,son.
      I think the mods will let this one slide
      Last edited by The_Expert; 08-02-2011, 12:53 PM.

      Comment

      • Johnwoo8686
        The Devil's Double
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2010
        • 4129
        • 437
        • 469
        • 17,303

        #163
        Originally posted by cupocity303

        Here is how I answer that.

        A 6'7 freak nature in the 60's could not move or develop the physique that the 6'7 guys have today. Usually being that size meant that you were slow and plodding.

        It's a norm that a 6'7 guy can almost move like a point guard, and just as fast in today's NBA. You take that 6'7 guy or 7 foot guy into a time machine, and into the NBA of the past, and he will be ahead of his time in size-ability.

        What is with these idiots pointing out to Vlads height? Ali beat Ernie Terrel who was a 6'6 heavyweight! So stop with the size comments. I think Prime for Prime Ali beats Wlad but past prime Ali loses!

        Comment

        • JAB5239
          Dallas Cowboys
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 27739
          • 5,038
          • 4,437
          • 73,018

          #164
          Originally posted by Die Antwoord
          In the 1920's all it took to be a professional boxer was to fight a professional fight. There are more TRUE professional boxers in Ohio today than there were before the 50's. Im talking guys who never had another job, never did anything but box. Never had to go work on the docks in their spare time, never went hungry, never missed practices or had to fight 40 times a year and thus wore their bodies down, sustained long lasting injuries, Im talking about guys who make a living, a completely living off of boxing.

          Lol, what a total crock of BS. Being a pro boxer doesn't mean you don't have to work. Guys like Peter Manfredo and Scottie Pemberton were high ranked fighters who fought for world titles and were popular tv fighters and HAD to work to support their families even with boxing. The fact is very few fighters worldwide make enough money off boxing alone to live comfortably. So spare us the bullshit already.

          Comment

          • stefl14
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2010
            • 944
            • 46
            • 0
            • 7,538

            #165
            I think people have been feeding the troll. If he aint a troll he is delusional. First he says Wlad would destroy Ali then you think ah well he is just another klit nuthugger. But then he says Byrd and Peter are better than Foreman and Frasier? My sister knows more about boxing than this ****er if he believes that.

            Comment

            • The_Expert
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2011
              • 203
              • 18
              • 26
              • 239

              #166
              Originally posted by stefl14
              I think people have been feeding the troll. If he aint a troll he is delusional. First he says Wlad would destroy Ali then you think ah well he is just another klit nuthugger. But then he says Byrd and Peter are better than Foreman and Frasier? My sister knows more about boxing than this ****er if he believes that.
              I was serious about Byrd beating Foreman.

              about Samuel Peter not so much

              Comment

              • stefl14
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 944
                • 46
                • 0
                • 7,538

                #167
                Originally posted by The_Expert
                I was serious about Byrd beating Foreman.

                about Samuel Peter not so much
                Which shows just how much you know about boxing... nothing!

                Comment

                • The_Expert
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 203
                  • 18
                  • 26
                  • 239

                  #168
                  Originally posted by stefl14
                  Which shows just how much you know about boxing... nothing!
                  Chris Byrd has fought bigger and stronger guys than Foreman.

                  Byrd is actualy the same weight as him.

                  Foreman with his slow wide punches is taylormade for Byrd.

                  Comment

                  • stefl14
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 944
                    • 46
                    • 0
                    • 7,538

                    #169
                    Originally posted by The_Expert
                    Chris Byrd has fought bigger and stronger guys than Foreman.

                    Byrd is actualy the same weight as him.

                    Foreman with his slow wide punches is taylormade for Byrd.
                    Norton was better than Byrd, look how that worked out.

                    Comment

                    • The_Expert
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jul 2011
                      • 203
                      • 18
                      • 26
                      • 239

                      #170
                      Originally posted by stefl14
                      Norton was better than Byrd, look how that worked out.
                      How did you come to the conclusion that Norton was better than Byrd???

                      Btw Norton and Byrd had complete different styles.

                      You are talking out of your ass, its you that knows **** about boxing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP