Opinion of Khan based on region of UK one lives in?

[chav]

French Prime Minister - "Multiculturalism has failed"
German Chancellor " Multiculturalism has failed"
British Primeminister "Multiculturalism has failed"

Ethnic ********** "We are so hard done by, everything is unfair, you are all racists...."

Denial.....and no that really isn't a river in Egypt.

[stefl14]

Of course it would be in his interest to say this man. I remember WHEN he said this, and he said it to gain votes, since it reflected the views of some people. That is not to say, he doesn't also believe it, but he purely said it for votes, it was a cold calculated move to gain votes.

And in case you haven't been following the news, he just basically backtracked, because of the Norway *********, he had to.

When the prime minister said this, it was controversial. Many white people disagree with it but many people disagree with it. Unfortunately for the prime minister, the votes he would have gained would have probably been more than offset by the votes he lost. That's just my opinion. Irrespective of whether it was to gain votes or not, he was right and it is undeniable. there are double standards and people are afraid to stand up to racism coming from ethnic ********** as it is not politically correct.

[Jedi Vader]

but they tolerated sikh ***ellery...

Yes they do and also the clothing and turbans.

If we can accept that in our country, why is it that if we went over to Pakistan and preached Christianity or built one of our churches, we'd be stoned to death or stabbed??

It's double standards like these that rile people up in Britain.

[Froghead99]

No one is saying that hurts British culture, but its a pathetic example of how PC Britain has come, which is PART of what's resulted in what's happening right now with the EDL, BNP, look at the prime ministers quotes for crying out loud. Think about it, if something inconsequential like that, has to be changed, in order not to offend people, then think of that on a larger scale.

Translated.

Too difficult to argue with, as he makes valid points, whilst I only have my stubbornness to rely on.

Not one good point have made from all the things you've said.

You don't get tired of making an ass of yourself, and embarrassing yourself do you?

No one is saying it marginalizes British cultures? You ***ing liar, you're the one that said it, Here are YOU OWN WORDS.

This is what Froghead99 has lost sight of in his xenophobic filled agenda, that actually, part of the reason for this uprising with the EDL, is BECAUSE Britain has become so PC, too tolerant to other cultures, whilst marginalizing its own, which has left some people disgruntled.

Quote:
Blackboards in school being renamed "Chalkboards" to avoid offending black people.

City councils "banning" Christmas to avoid offending ***s, ******s, Pagans, and other religious/non-religious folk.

Manhole covers being renamed "Personnel Access Units" to avoid offending women.
__________________

And again, how is becoming too PC driving people to EDL, thats such a ***ing idiotic thing to say. OMG NO, my teacher is saying CHALKBOARD, and not BLACKBOARD!!!!! They're Marginalizing BRITISH CULTURE!!!!

This is merely a weak and dishonest rationalization used by racists, but you're so dumb and simple-minded that you bought into it. Which really isn't surprising. And you're the one that idiotically said it is marginalizing British Culture.

But once I called you out on your dumb BS, you backtracked, which I guess you had to, because even you realize how ***ing ******ed your arguments are.

[stefl14]

Yes they do and also the clothing and turbans.

If we can accept that in our country, why is it that if we went over to Pakistan and preached Christianity or built one of our churches, we'd be stoned to death or stabbed??

It's double standards like these that rile people up in Britain.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

[Froghead99]

Yes they do and also the clothing and turbans.

If we can accept that in our country, why is it that if we went over to Pakistan and preached Christianity or built one of our churches, we'd be stoned to death or stabbed??

It's double standards like these that rile people up in Britain.

First of all they have churches and Christians in Pakistan, who are not stoned to death. Dumb ass. Lol.

Second of all, are you really saying that what Britain should be like, is by comparing it to a third world country?

Just try thinking a little, and no these are not the double standards that preoccupy people, just idiots like you.

[stefl14]

First of all they have churches and Christians in Pakistan, who are not stoned to death. Lol.

Second of all, are you really saying that what Britain should be like, is by comparing it to a third world country?

Just try thinking a little, and no these are not the double standards that preoccupy people, just idiots like you.

The third world country **** is valid, but you can't say it's right that ethnic ********** are allowed to celebrate their religion in schools whereas christians are denied the right to do so in some cases as it may be deemed offensive.

[Dynamite Kid]

You don't get tired of making an ass of yourself, and embarrassing yourself do you?

No one is saying it marginalizes British cultures? You ***ing liar, you're the one that said it, Here are YOU OWN WORDS.

If you mean, do I get tired of owning you with salient points, no, cause its so easy, and I'm superior.


Its PART of it. Do you really think that I think that some of those examples are the sole reason for the disenchantment of the general public? There is a lot more to it than that.

Why do you think I sighted the examples as pathetic examples of PC, but significant BECAUSE there so insignificant? Cause its part of a wider issue.

And again, how is becoming too PC driving people to EDL, thats such a ***ing idiotic thing to say. OMG NO, my teacher is saying CHALKBOARD, and not BLACKBOARD!!!!! They're Marginalizing BRITISH CULTURE!!!!

This is merely a weak and dishonest rationalization used by racists, but you're so dumb and simple-minded that you bought into it. Which really isn't surprising. And you're the one that idiotically said it is marginalizing British Culture.

Because when some people feel you're catering more for someone else's needs, when your supposed to be catering for both, it stands to reason they can become disillusioned, under appreciated.

I have addressed that point in bold, you just dont have a good retort, so will labour the same point I addressed. As I told you, exaggerating a point doesn't make one, it makes it seem like you dont have a counter point to make.

Its a theory, where is yours, the one I continually keep asking for?

[Jedi Vader]

First of all they have churches and Christians in Pakistan, who are not stoned to death. Dumb ass. Lol.

Second of all, are you really saying that what Britain should be like, is by comparing it to a third world country?

Just try thinking a little, and no these are not the double standards that preoccupy people, just idiots like you.

You have clearly missed the point and reverted to name calling.

****** violence against Christians

Cathedral church of Resurrection, Lahore, PakistanOn October 28, 2001 in Lahore, Pakistan, Islamic militants killed 15 Christians at a church, three weeks after U.S.-led War in Afghanistan to topple the Taliban.

On September 25, 2002, unidentified gunmen shot dead seven people at a Christian charity in Karachi's central business district. They entered the third-floor offices of the Institute for Peace and Justice (IPJ) and shot their victims in the head. All of the victims were Pakistani Christians. Karachi police chief Tariq Jamil said the victims had their hands tied and their mouths had been covered with tape.

The All Pakistan Minority Alliance said, "We have become increasingly victimised since the launch of the US-led international war on terror. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the international community to ensure that the government protects us."[15]

In November 2005, 3,000 militant Islamists attacked Christians in Sangla Hill in Pakistan and destroyed Roman Catholic, Salvation Army and United Presbyterian churches. The attack was over allegations of violation of blasphemy laws by a Pakistani Christian named Yousaf Masih. The attacks were widely condemned by some political parties in Pakistan.[16] However, Pakistani Christians have expressed disappointment that they have not received justice. Samson Dilawar, a parish priest in Sangla Hill, has said that the police have not committed to trial any of the people who were arrested for committing the assaults, and that the Pakistani government did not inform the Christian community that a judicial inquiry was underway by a local judge. He continued to say that ****** clerics "make hateful speeches about Christians" and "continue insulting Christians and our faith".[17]

In February 2006, churches and Christian schools were targeted in protests over the publications of the Jyllands-Posten cartoons in Denmark, leaving two elderly women injured and many homes and properties destroyed. Some of the mobs were stopped by police.[18]

On June 5, 2006, a Pakistani Christian stonemason named Nasir Ashraf was working near Lahore when he drank water from a public facility using a glass chained to the facility. He was assaulted by ******s for "Polluting the glass". A mob developed, who beat Ashraf, calling him a "Christian dog".Bystanders encouraged the beating, because it would be a "good" deed that would help them get into heaven. Ashraf was eventually hospitalized.[19][20]

On August 2006, a church and Christian homes were attacked in a village outside of Lahore, Pakistan in a land dispute. Three Christians were seriously injured and one missing after some 35 ******s burned buildings, desecrated Bibles and attacked Christians.[21]

Based, in part, on such incidents, Pakistan was recommended by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) in May 2006 to be designated as a "Country of Particular Concern" (CPC) by the Department of State.[21]

In January 2008 a Christian medical superintendent in Bannu was kidnapped and held for 25 days, according to the Barnabas Fund.[citation needed] In July 2008, a ****** mob stormed a Protestant church during a prayer service on the outskirts of Pakistan's largest city, Karachi, denouncing the Christians as "infidels" and injuring several, including a pastor.[22]

The 2009 Gojra riots was a series of violent pogroms against Christian ********** by ******s.[23]

In June 2009, International Christian Concern reported the **** and killing of a Christian man in Pakistan, for refusing to convert to Islam.[24]

In March 2011, Shahbaz Bhatti was killed by gunmen after he spoke out against Pakistan's blasphemy laws. The U.K. increased financial aid to the country, sparking criticism of British foreign secretary William Hague. Cardinal Keith O’Brien stated, "To increase aid to the Pakistan government when religious freedom is not upheld and those who speak up for religious freedom are gunned down is tantamount to an anti-Christian foreign policy."[25]

Catholic Church in Pakistan requested to Pope Benedict to declare martyrdom of Shahbaz Bhatti.[26]

At least 20 people, including police officials, were wounded as 500 ****** demonstrators turned ugly and attacked the Christian community in Gujranwala city on April 29, 2011, ********** Concern of Pakistan has learnt.[27]

During a press conference in Karachi, the largest city of Pakistan, on May 30, 2011, Maulana Abdul Rauf Farooqi and other clerics of Jamiat-Ulema-e-Islam quoted “immoral Biblical stories” and demanded to ban the Bible. Maulana Farooqi said, “Our lawyers are preparing to ask the court to ban the book.”[28]

Does this happen in Britain towards ******s then Bro? Do we burn down Mosques then Bro??

The third world country **** is valid, but you can't say its right that ethnic ********** are allowed to celebrate their religion in schools where christians are denied the right to do so in some cases as it may be deemed offensive.

That is precisely the point that I'm making.

[Froghead99]

The third world country **** is valid, but you can't say it's right that ethnic ********** are allowed to celebrate their religion in schools whereas christians are denied the right to do so in some cases as it may be deemed offensive.

Dude, show me an article that says ethnic ********** are allowed to celebrate their religon, while Christians aren't in the UK.

We already discussed the BS article you posted, and we already established NO SCHOOL HAS BANNED CROSSES and CRUCIFIXES, while allowing other religous symbols. It DIDN't HAPPEN, so why do you falsely keep repeating the same nonsense?

All the article was about is a DRAFT from ONE AUTHORITY that FORGOT to add CROSSES and CRUCIFIXES into a document, NO SCHOOL ACTUALLY BANNED CROSSES WHILE ALLOWING OTHER RELIGOUS SYMBOLS. Okay?

That article was about a DRAFT of an DOCUMENT, it was not about any school. No school banned crosses, aight? Notice, there is no mention of any school following this interpretation, because IT NEVER HAPPENED.

Got it?