Opinion of Khan based on region of UK one lives in?

[Froghead99]

Here is another, perhaps more convincing argument regarding the subject.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/reli...h-****les.html

Did you read the article? You obviously didn't. This is my point about the dailytelegraph, all they do is post a sensationalist headline and they know gullible people or someone who didn't read it fully, will buy it.

Lauren Grimshaw-Brown was told to take off a necklace with a cross on it due to health and safety reasons.

"The necklace is designed to come apart if it snags. The school has suggested she wear a brooch but surely that's more dangerous because of the pin.

"I've got absolutely no problem with any other religion wearing ****les or another item of ***ellery but why can't my daughter wear a necklace with a cross? It's a church-led school.

"This is because there have been incidences in schools where hooped earrings, bracelets and necklaces have caused injuries to children when caught in outdoor play or physical activity.

Mrs Wright denied there was any discrimination against people following a Christian faith.

"We do want children to be proud of their Christian faith, therefore we would like to encourage them to wear crosses," she said.

"The best solution in this case for children to be kept safe would be for pupils to wear a brooch - in fact some children already do."

SEE! Crosses are NOT BANNED, in this case one simply needs to wear a brooch, for safety reasons. Other students do this.

This is your typical daily telegraph sensationalism. Come on dude, this is getting tiring. You need to read dailytelegraph articles carefully, don't buy into the BS.

[DET. IRONSIDE]

You have clearly missed the point and reverted to name calling.



Does this happen in Britain towards ******s then Bro? Do we burn down Mosques then Bro??



That is precisely the point that I'm making.

It would happen if Turkey flew in with NATO troops and occupied Britain because it was the biggest power in the world and felt annoyed at the Brits because their government had links with the PKK who flew two planes into lets say the Hagia Sofia and the Blue Mosque.

[Jedi Vader]

The article I provided is valid IMO though. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/reli...h-****les.html

It's definitely valid Bro but it will still be ignored, as will mine.

[Dynamite Kid]

Maybe this is irrelevant, but here goes, and this is a true story, and I say this on my kids lives its true.

I used to work at a bakery called Harvestime, well one day after finishing a long shift, whilst walking past the local Holiday Hypermarket, I saw this Asian guy walking toward me, I knew he was staring, so because I was tired, and didn't want to start any ****, I broke eye contact, as though I wasn't interested in fighting or anything, only as I went to pass him, he spat on me, I said what's your game, he grabbed me in a headlock, I managed to leaver him off a little bit, and the only thing available to me, was his face, so I sunk my teeth into his face, then he let go, then I put a combo into him, he came back at me, so I created some space for myself, jumped in with a left hook right hand, then he tried to come at me again, I did the same thing again, only this time I cut his eye open, blood was streaming down his face, soon as he realized, he stopped, then this Asian kid I knew from work, who was walking the same way, had seen it, then split it up, I got out of there a bit sharpish as I've been done for fighting in town before(camera's)

Turns out the kid was 28, I was only 21 at the time, he took his parents around that kid I knew's house, to find out who I was, irony is, he lived in a heavily populated area of Asians, which was situated where I worked.

[Jedi Vader]

It would happen if Turkey flew in with NATO troops and occupied Britain because it was the biggest power in the world and felt annoyed at the Brits because their government had links with the PKK who flew two planes into lets say the Hagia Sofia and the Blue Mosque.

Sorry Bro, IF won't do.

Factual happenings are only considered canon.

[DET. IRONSIDE]

The article I provided is valid IMO though. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/reli...h-****les.html

The obvious counter argument is predictable: Sikh law mandates wearing ****les. Arguing this would be clutching at straws, I see no reason why, in the interests of health and safety, Sikhs should be subject to different rules.

Number one: the bible doesn't say you must wear a chastity ring, it is in fact a moneymaking scheme for Disney if you watch the South Park episode "The Ring"
neither does the bible say you have to wear a cross

Number two: The guru granth sahib DOES say that

[Froghead99]

It's definitely valid Bro but it will still be ignored, as will mine.

No Its not a valid point, READ THE ARTICLE and you will see Crosses are NOT BANNED. READ THE ACTUAL ARTICLE, for gods sake.

[DET. IRONSIDE]

Maybe this is irrelevant, but here goes, and this is a true story, and I say this on my kids lives its true.

I used to work at a bakery called Harvestime, well one day after finishing a long shift, whilst walking past the local Holiday Hypermarket, I saw this Asian guy walking toward me, I knew he was staring, so because I was tired, and didn't want to start any ****, I broke eye contact, as though I wasn't interested in fighting or anything, only as I went to pass him, he spat on me, I said what's your game, he grabbed me in a headlock, I managed to leaver him off a little bit, and the only thing available to me, was his face, so I sunk my teeth into his face, then he let go, then I put a combo into him, he came back at me, so I created some space for myself, jumped in with a left hook right hand, then he tried to come at me again, I did the same thing again, only this time I cut his eye open, blood was streaming down his face, soon as he realized, he stopped, then this Asian kid I knew from work, who was walking the same way, had seen it, then split it up, I got out of there a bit sharpish as I've been done for fighting in town before(camera's)

Turns out the kid was 28, I was only 21 at the time, he took his parents around that kid I knew's house, to find out who I was, irony is, he lived in a heavily populated area of Asians, which was situated where I worked.

pics or it didn't happen

























jk

[Froghead99]

Lauren Grimshaw-Brown was told to take off a necklace with a cross on it due to health and safety reasons.

"The necklace is designed to come apart if it snags. The school has suggested she wear a brooch but surely that's more dangerous because of the pin.

"I've got absolutely no problem with any other religion wearing ****les or another item of ***ellery but why can't my daughter wear a necklace with a cross? It's a church-led school.

"This is because there have been incidences in schools where hooped earrings, bracelets and necklaces have caused injuries to children when caught in outdoor play or physical activity.

Mrs Wright denied there was any discrimination against people following a Christian faith.

"We do want children to be proud of their Christian faith, therefore we would like to encourage them to wear crosses," she said.

"The best solution in this case for children to be kept safe would be for pupils to wear a brooch - in fact some children already do."

For the last time crosses were not banned. You guys need to READ THE ARTICLE.

[stefl14]

Number one: the bible doesn't say you must wear a chastity ring, it is in fact a moneymaking scheme for Disney if you watch the South Park episode "The Ring"
neither does the bible say you have to wear a cross

Number two: The guru granth sahib DOES say that

Still, it could be detrimental to health and safety. In my old school people were not allowed to wear crosses but hindus were allowed to wear them string things. Hindus themselves have said to me they are not necessary.