Will Dawson request testing for Hopkins bout?

[sdcluser]

Oh and thank you for the guys that brought up Bute, you guys managed to come up with an option before this guy that I have been asking for over an hour, not one for HBO but hey at least you came up with a name that makes some sense.

I do know the BUte option but I also know he is already signed and he is Showtime's GUY and is OBLIGED to do what Showtime wants as they offer big $$. YOU think that you are the only here that follow boxing news.

[The Gambler1981]

Exactly. That is why BHop would have more leverage. Thank you for making part of my point for me.

I don't have a reading comp problem. I have a prob you seem to have a differential standard which substance can or cannot be tested.
Why doesn't it bother you when a dude gets busted for pot? Obviously, OST DIFFER. POT does kill some pain you know and supposedly has some MEDICINAL (pharmaceutical) value? Hmmm....

No he doesn't because people do not equate pot or any drugs of recreation with PED in terms of athletic competition. So you are being disingenuous~

You certainly have a reading comprehension problem and a problem sticking to one point. my point stands and remains the same you have come from 360 degrees and have exactly nothing to show for it. Because I did not say that it shouldn't be tested for I said

I don't care about it in terms of what I think about an athlete big difference. Better pain killers than pot are allowed so that point is moot.

Try again clown

[The Gambler1981]

I do know the BUte option but I also know he is already signed and he is Showtime's GUY and is OBLIGED to do what Showtime wants as they offer big $$. YOU think that you are the only here that follow boxing news.

You have no right to talk about that because I asked you for options for an hour and you gave me exactly zero options~ don't steal other peoples ideas.

[sdcluser]

You have no right to talk about that because I asked you for options for an hour and you gave me exactly zero options~ don't steal other peoples ideas.

Stealing ideas?!
LMAO. Bute deal with Showtime is know to most.

Most ppl know that using pot after boxing match when tested would fail.

[sdcluser]

You have no right to talk about that because I asked you for options for an hour and you gave me exactly zero options~ don't steal other peoples ideas.

Oh you are have right here to talk about what you want. GTFO here.

[sdcluser]

No he doesn't because people do not equate pot or any drugs of recreation with PED in terms of athletic competition. So you are being disingenuous~

You certainly have a reading comprehension problem and a problem sticking to one point. my point stands and remains the same you have come from 360 degrees and have exactly nothing to show for it. Because I did not say that it shouldn't be tested for I said

I don't care about it in terms of what I think about an athlete big difference. Better pain killers than pot are allowed so that point is moot.

Try again clown

You have problem understanding my point: BHop would not look bad as what you perceived and doesn't need this fight. HBO is not all powerful as you have claimed. The fight will not happen if nobody agrees to the terms and there are options (maybe less favorable but reasonable ones). BHop has better option and better leverage and NEVER tested positive AFAIK. More ppl would watch a LEGEND (a point you mentioned) than from someone from an anemic performance. These points are all WE disagree on no?

FACT:
Testing positive for a test means cheating. You don't seem to get that.
Dawson agree to the terms PRIOR to testing and tested positive for a substance HE KNOWS it's illegal for boxing.

Dawson has much less leverage, a point you obviously disagree. Dawson needs the fight MORE than BHop.


Of course you don't. We already know that. You should go ask why they test for pot and "recreational" substances.

[The Gambler1981]

Stealing ideas?!
LMAO. Bute deal with Showtime is know to most.

Most ppl know that using pot after boxing match when tested would fail.

Stealing ideas because you brought zero alternatives to the table so you are biting off of other posters.

So what?

[The Gambler1981]

Oh you are have right here to talk about what you want. GTFO here.

Way to respond to the same post twice clown~ I asked you to provide options if you were the one that came up with the idea I would be willing to discuss it.

I would with the guys that brought it up but not with you~

[The Gambler1981]

You have problem understanding my point: BHop would not look bad as what you perceived and doesn't need this fight. HBO is not all powerful as you have claimed. The fight will not happen if nobody agrees to the terms and there are options (maybe less favorable but reasonable ones). BHop has better option and better leverage and NEVER tested positive AFAIK. More ppl would watch a LEGEND (a point you mentioned) than from someone from an anemic performance. These points are all WE disagree on no?

FACT:
Testing positive for a test means cheating. You don't seem to get that.
Dawson agree to the terms PRIOR to testing and tested positive for a substance HE KNOWS it's illegal for boxing.

Dawson has much less leverage, a point you obviously disagree. Dawson needs the fight MORE than BHop.


Of course you don't. We already know that. You should go ask why they test for pot and "recreational" substances.

You don't get it that much is clear~ go on fooling yourself if you desire but you have been exposed in this thread.

[sdcluser]

You don't get it that much is clear~ go on fooling yourself if you desire but you have been exposed in this thread.

Wow. What a response. Why don't you answer any of the point? The only one being exposed is YOU. BHOP >>> Dawson and has the leverage - a point you highly disagree and has no answer for.