Who has the better WW career Floyd or Manny

[spyvsspy]

Man you don't know boxing!!!

Baldomir was LINEAL!!!!!
A,B,C,D or whatever.... LINEAL!!!!!!

Funny how you say they were never at the top tier... but they were ALL CHAMPS!!!!

Hatton beat Collazo for HIS title...
What are you talking about?!?!?

Cotto lost his to Margarito... So he conveniently waited for P-Will to vacate and fought for the vacant against....... Mick..... so i guess he was the man...

HA!!!!!!

If Hatton was so great how come he wasn't on anybody's hit list?

Baldomir wasn't on anybody's hit list.

Cotto demolished Judah. And Judah was doing a number on Floid.

[ChampBox@PR]

he fought hopkins like 3 years before floyd..semi retired and returned to beat mayorga ..he was faaaaar from prime..mosley beat prime oscar

I agree with Larryx, Floyd and Pac beat a past prime Oscar!!!

[ADP02]

the great Marquez alone is better then Cotto and Clottey put together

So Floyd beating Marquez at 147 is better than Manny beating Cotto and Clottey?

Your post will probably be rated very high on the worst post of the month ..... maybe year!!!

[AssasinKing]

Juanma lost to a bum... Floyd's last fight is against one of the best WW of all time.. Who might beat Pac. The fight before he owned someone who took Pac to a dark place... TWICE!!! Pac is great but he's got nothing for Floyd.. If Shane KO's Pac what will u say then? Lol.. Its the year of the upset..

Wow i thought you spoke abit of sense until that statement

hahahaha....a fkin lightweight (just about) who moved up 2!!!! DIVISIONS, to take on the "best fighter of this era" are u ***in kidding me?

How embarrassing is that

Floyd beat Baldomir...Baldomir had beaten Judah while he was his mandatory challenger... Floyd then beat the WW champ of the world who had not 1,2, but 3 belts!!!!

love him or hate him... he's the best

So basically....He beat an easy boxer.....to get the belts etc...and hes the best because of this....

Boxing is about WHO you fight, not what you win.......Look how many fights were done just because of the boxers wanting to prove something, that didnt involve a belt.....and alot of those fights meant 10 times more than alot of fights that had belts on the line....

[Larry the boss]

Wow i thought you spoke abit of sense until that statement

hahahaha....a fkin lightweight (just about) who moved up 2!!!! DIVISIONS, to take on the "best fighter of this era" are u ***in kidding me?

How embarrassing is that



So basically....He beat an easy boxer.....to get the belts etc...and hes the best because of this....

r.....Look how many fights were done just because of the boxers wanting to prove something, that didnt involve a belt.....and alot of those fights meant 10 times more than alot of fights that had belts on the line....

lol..really???

[KingOfBox]

If Hatton was so great how come he wasn't on anybody's hit list?

Baldomir wasn't on anybody's hit list.

Cotto demolished Judah. And Judah was doing a number on Floid.

Hit list... who cares what hit list you're talking about... They didn't need to be on anybody's hit list, they were WORLD CHAMPS

You can pretend and ADD or SUBTRACT from Floyd's resume... but he is undefeated and has fought in 18 World title fights.... UNDEFEATED 18-0....

PAC is 13-1-2 in world title fights.... He's beaten 12 champs. and lost or tied with 4 former champs. OVERALL Floyd has fought more champs with better results.

Look it up!

[KingOfBox]

Hit list... who cares what hit list you're talking about... They didn't need to be on anybody's hit list, they were WORLD CHAMPS

You can pretend and ADD or SUBTRACT from Floyd's resume... but he is undefeated and has fought in 18 World title fights.... UNDEFEATED 18-0....

PAC is 13-1-2 in world title fights.... He's beaten 12 champs. and lost or tied with 4 former champs. OVERALL Floyd has fought more champs with better results.

Look it up!

Do the math... almost half of Floyd's fights have been TITLE fights!!!!

[Phenom]

So Floyd beating Marquez at 147 is better than Manny beating Cotto and Clottey?

Your post will probably be rated very high on the worst post of the month ..... maybe year!!!

If we are looking just at the names on the resume and ignoring the weights and where the boxers were in there career leading up to the fights then yes the great JMM is a better name to have on your resume then Cotto and Clottey combined..


but really I don't give credit to Floyd for beating JMM at a weight he never fought in before also I won't give credit to Manny for beating a washed up fighter for a vacant belt at a catchweight

[KingOfBox]

Wow i thought you spoke abit of sense until that statement

hahahaha....a fkin lightweight (just about) who moved up 2!!!! DIVISIONS, to take on the "best fighter of this era" are u ***in kidding me?

How embarrassing is that

Duran beat Leonard didn't he????? a much faster, more talented, bigger, stronger man....

Don't try that... Marquez was top 3, 4 or 5 p4p. Floyd didn't impose his size on JMM... He imposed his SKILLS!!! It wasn't because he hit too hard or because he was too tall or too long. Its because he was more skilled

[» HE3R0 «]

2009

Ring Magazine Welterweight Rankings
1. Shane Mosley
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito
4. Joshua Clottey
5. Manny Pacqiao

2011

Manny took an embarrassingly long time to try and fight the four guys above him.

fuc.kin' Manny "Slacker" Pacquiao am I right?

If he really wanted to impress people. He should've been fighting 3 times a year or have 2 fights a night.

Because that's what Floyd did.

Right?