
Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
The hagler fight was pick em and SRL spluttered and wasnt dominant. I dont think SRL would dominate Pacs opponents like Pac did. Thats why after Pac destroyed Margarito people were saying its quite possible Pac is the GOAT now. They couldnt visualize SRL or Duran do those things.
On the other hand, most people can see Pac would be favoured of beating Duran, Benitez, and Hearns as well.Comment
-
[QUOTE=Stromprophet;10429981]De La Hoya is commonly ranked above both Hagler and Hearns. Mosely is ranked around the same area. Mayweather ranked slightly lower. Personally I think Hagler is vastly over rated. He retired early, and he didn't fight enough competition. JMM,
MAB, Morales are all ranked in the 40s of the top 50 fighters of all time. Hearns and Hagler are ranked in the 30s.
QUOTE]Comment
-
Comment
-
I thought there were gonna be alot of Pac fans in this thread for Pac but its only one or two guys.
But yeah Im not boxing historian, far from it, but it seems Sugar Ray Leonard has far and away the better resume.
Doesnt mean Pac's is bad. Ray's is just better.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Walt Liquor;10440958]De La Hoya is commonly ranked above both Hagler and Hearns. Mosely is ranked around the same area. Mayweather ranked slightly lower. Personally I think Hagler is vastly over rated. He retired early, and he didn't fight enough competition. JMM,
MAB, Morales are all ranked in the 40s of the top 50 fighters of all time. Hearns and Hagler are ranked in the 30s.
QUOTE]Comment
-
No historian worth his salt thinks SRL has a better resume than Pac.Last edited by hugh grant; 04-27-2011, 04:51 AM.Comment
Comment