Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

[hugh grant]

None of them are on the level of Hagler, Duran, or Hearns. That's not even a debatable topic.

So in your opinion SRL 3 best wins are better than Pac s 3 best wins? That's only an opinion and then your 3 best wins being better on paper don't make it a better. resume.
3 good wins don't overhaul good wins over 23 years. Noones going to give 23 years of their life to be deemed below and beneath 3 better wins in someone's opinion!I Hearns, hagler and Benitez mightve had off night? So what if some think SRL 3 best wins are better? That's got nothing to do with having a better resume. Randolph Turpins best win is better than SRLs best win. So how many would Randolph need to be deemed better than Srl or pac resume wise? What I'm saying is broaden your range and have more abstract thinking?
You see where I'm going with this? Nobody cares about srl 3 best wins because thisvthread isn't asking who has the 3 best wins!

[BodyBagz]

Pacquiao enhanced his resume a fair bit since this question. Rios, Horn, Bradley, Broner, Thurman, Algieri.

I hope you're kidding !!!!

Baby Margarito ?!?!?!
Part-time school teacher HORN ?!?!?!
Shot Broner ?!?!?
Shot Algieri* ?!?!?
Desert Breeze ''robbed'' him so I guess 3x was needed
Pac didn't want more than 1 fight with HORN !!!!!
Sometime was an aight W.....

Talk about flimsy ''enhancements''

[BodyBagz]

So in your opinion SRL 3 best wins are better than Pac s 3 best wins? That's only an opinion and then your 3 best wins being better on paper don't make it a better. resume.
3 good wins don't overhaul good wins over 23 years. Noones going to give 23 years of their life to be deemed below and beneath 3 better wins in someone's opinion!I Hearns, hagler and Benitez mightve had off night? So what if some think SRL 3 best wins are better? That's got nothing to do with having a better resume. Randolph Turpins best win is better than SRLs best win. So how many would Randolph need to be deemed better than Srl or pac resume wise? What I'm saying is broaden your range and have more abstract thinking?
You see where I'm going with this? Nobody cares about srl 3 best wins because thisvthread isn't asking who has the 3 best wins!

Pac's FIRST 40 FIGHTS were vs BUMS.

That's a great part of a career.
Yeah, yeah...Eric and Marco.....

99% of his WW career was trash (OK, Ok !!!! Somtime was an aight W)

[megas30]

yeh, but it's like laing beat duran. And didn't srl only beat duran, as duran partied a bit too hard?

Nah, SRL beat Duran because he changed his tactics. The first fight he fought Duran's fight; however, in the second fight he boxed him. Duran wasn't able to pin him against the rope. He tried to lure him into a brawl, but this time Leonard didn't fall for it, so Durant went "no mas".

[F l i c k e r]

None of them are on the level of Hagler, Duran, or Hearns. That's not even a debatable topic.

Never said they were, I said they were ATGs.

Which isn't a debatable topic.

[HeadShots]

Pac > Leonard

[Roadblock]

So in your opinion SRL 3 best wins are better than Pac s 3 best wins? That's only an opinion and then your 3 best wins being better on paper don't make it a better. resume.
3 good wins don't overhaul good wins over 23 years. Noones going to give 23 years of their life to be deemed below and beneath 3 better wins in someone's opinion!I Hearns, hagler and Benitez mightve had off night? So what if some think SRL 3 best wins are better? That's got nothing to do with having a better resume. Randolph Turpins best win is better than SRLs best win. So how many would Randolph need to be deemed better than Srl or pac resume wise? What I'm saying is broaden your range and have more abstract thinking?
You see where I'm going with this? Nobody cares about srl 3 best wins because thisvthread isn't asking who has the 3 best wins!

You gotta be one of the most inconsistent poster in here, you spin and flip whatever BS fits your agenda, if you say nobody cares about SRL best wins why do you bring them up every time Floyd is the topic and Ray is mentioned, at least be consistent from one fighter to the next, don't you have a hard-coded belief system why does it change daily just apply the same criteria to all and you will be a lot more creditable.

Broaden your range and having more abstract thinking doesn't mean changing your tune based on your favouritism.

[$tate of Mind]

Pac has been more dominating as a boxer by far. SRL has never dominated a boxer of Morales calibre like Pac has. And then you have the barreras, JMM, DLH, Cottos, Hattons who is better than Dave boy Green, and etc etc.

Have you ever heard of Hearns, Duran, Hagler, Benitez, etc?

[$tate of Mind]

Pac > Leonard

Based on what?