Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
    What exactly have I boxrec'ed and Youtube'd?

    I seriously doubt you have been watching boxing since the Thrilla in Manila.
    i was a young kid back then, watched it live, they showed it in the school library. that got me hooked. saw most of ali's fights from then on. till how holmes ****ed up old ali. saw tyson's explosive rise to fame and the 4 kings of the 80s. i kid you not.

    you may had more time on your hands than me expanding your knowledge, but the fact is, just reading it or watching youtubes doesnt let you in on the actual drama around each fight.

    if there was internet back then, w/ all these bloggers/haters and wouldbe-writers, im pretty sure those fights you listed as greater than pac's wins would have their own share of criticisms.

    Comment


    • I think this thread served it's purpose the true tards have been exposed.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by VWEBBJR View Post
        And another one meets the ignore list.
        Is that means you're DUCKING??? JUst like your Idol Floyd?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by FootWork777 View Post
          Sugar Ray Leonard is a legend. Floyd and Pac's resumes combined can not top what Leonard has done. Who has Pac or Floyd beat that is half as good as a young, prime, undefeated ww Hearns? Leonard would jump at the opportunity to KO Martinez if he was fighting today.
          SRL is a Legend! Pac is the GREATEST OF ALL TIME!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by FootWork777 View Post
            Sugar Ray Leonard is a legend. Floyd and Pac's resumes combined can not top what Leonard has done. Who has Pac or Floyd beat that is half as good as a young, prime, undefeated ww Hearns? Leonard would jump at the opportunity to KO Martinez if he was fighting today.
            Hearns was untested as a WW when unbeaten and exposed by SRL. Morales is better than Hearns. Way past his prime and beats Maidana. When hearns was slightly past it, he was losing to the Barkleys of this world.

            You cheerleading anything connected with SRL is not fooling anyone. Morales, barrera are two of the greatest mexican names ever and could slip comfortably into any time period.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Twako View Post
              i was a young kid back then, watched it live, they showed it in the school library. that got me hooked. saw most of ali's fights from then on. till how holmes ****ed up old ali. saw tyson's explosive rise to fame and the 4 kings of the 80s. i kid you not.

              you may had more time on your hands than me expanding your knowledge, but the fact is, just reading it or watching youtubes doesnt let you in on the actual drama around each fight.

              if there was internet back then, w/ all these bloggers/haters and wouldbe-writers, im pretty sure those fights you listed as greater than pac's wins would have their own share of criticisms.
              I saw it live too, on closed circuit in an arena. Everyone going wild, with the back and forth. Early great Ali rocking Frazier, then it looked like Frazier was destroying ALi's body and he would fall in mid-fight, only to wtiness that incredible comeback.

              Hard to describe!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                Hearns was untested as a WW when unbeaten and exposed by SRL. Morales is better than Hearns. Way past his prime and beats Maidana. When hearns was slightly past it, he was losing to the Barkleys of this world.

                You cheerleading anything connected with SRL is not fooling anyone. Morales, barrera are two of the greatest mexican names ever and could slip comfortably into any time period.
                care to explain this???

                how exactly was he untested? when you go to boxrec to look this stuff up, do you ever bother to actually look into some of the names you glace over if you don't recognize?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Twako View Post
                  name-wise on a resume? SRL tops it. ATG'ness? it evens out. PAC's HOFers in the lower weights plus his dominance over bigger men of caliber balances it out.
                  you ***in moron, what's the title of the thread

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FootWork777 View Post
                    I know, I will literally laugh at anybody who picks Pac in this poll. There isn't a fighter from today's era that can approach what Leonard did.
                    Floyd >>> Leonard >>>> Pacquiao > Ortiz > Charlie Sheen

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      There are people on Pacs resume that could beat Duran. JMM would likely outpoint duran on any given day as would barrera in his day, not to mention Margarito. If kirkland laing can im sure Margarito could.

                      That dont take away from Duran. Hes got enough good wins on his resume to be taken seriously.
                      I really regretted not seeing more of your posts earlier this year.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP