How come Pacquiao never fought Guzman??
Collapse
-
Comment
-
ooooOOoOOoOOohh...Dazed getting really chappy
yes, you're talking about it and looking like an ignorant douche...people gave you reasons, you throw a hissy fit
you want me to make a PEDs thread so you can go full PMS and let it all out?Comment
-
You act like he fought Marquez four times in that span or something. He fought Morales two extra times for no reason and Barrera a second time for no reason. Not to mention a slew of homecoming fights. He had chances. Just didn't do it. And let's face it, Guzman was a better challenge than the fading Barrera and the emaciated Morales who got battered by Raheem.Comment
-
In 10+ years Nobody is going to know who Guzman is. Don't you get it?
Here's another example for you low IQ's. Obviously Pac fighting Morales again 5 years ago is better than fighting Mosley in May.....but is still better than fighting Guzman.
Pac's resume with Mosley on it >>>>>>>>>>>>> A nobody like Guzman
So in summary for u low IQs.
Pac's resume with Morales>>With Mosley>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>With GuzmanComment
-
Why, so your d*ckriding ass could post pics and run? Nah, I'll pass. Lol @ hissy fit while you come on here and play Johhny Cochrane. Guzman was too risky, period. That simple, whether you Pac lovers like it or not.Comment
-
and if Pac fought Guzman and Soto instead u gonna accuse him of ducking Morales and MAB who at that time ruled the division right?? Scalps from those 2 uved mentioned are **** compared to those 2 HOFrsComment
-
Maybe Guzman could have not stunk out the joint against Soto, made weight in his fights for the Lightweight title, or even at Welterweight. Don't blame Manny for failing to fight a guy that shot himself in the foot for four consecutive fights.Comment
Comment