better resume..hopkins,pacman
Collapse
-
Have to say I completely disagree here. P4P I would pick the Barrera Pacquiao beat the first time and the Morales Pacquiao lost to to beat Hopkins. Marquez would give Hopkins a hell of a fight and could beat him too. I don't think Hopkins ever fought fighters that good.
And Pacquiao does not lose to the Calzaghe or Wright Hopkins fought, he obliterates any version of Taylor or Pascal, and you already said he would beat the rest, and easily at that.Comment
-
Comment
-
Have to say I completely disagree here. P4P I would pick the Barrera Pacquiao beat the first time and the Morales Pacquiao lost to to beat Hopkins. Marquez would give Hopkins a hell of a fight and could beat him too. I don't think Hopkins ever fought fighters that good, except Jones.
And Pacquiao does not lose to the Calzaghe or Wright Hopkins fought, he obliterates any version of Taylor or Pascal, and you already said he would beat the rest, and easily at that.Comment
-
Holyfield was about 5 years too shot. As good of a win as ODLH on Manny's resume. You idiots don't count that win though right? So why do you count Holyfield? self contradicting idiots.
McCallum is a first ballot Hall of famer? Is Nunn? What about Barkley?
Cotto beat Shane. That is a first ballot hall of famer. Mosley > All those wins. Period.Comment
-
****ing Rican!
No but seriously, I can't stand this whole 'size' **** with Pac's wins.
Margarito isn't even close to his best win, at all. Hell, it's not even a legit win for him. Why all the 'size' this and 'size' that? It's so ******.
Compare Whitakers win over Nelson to Pac's win over Margarito. I guess 'size' means Pac's win over Margarito is better.
So ****ing idiotic seriously.Comment
-
Discounting the the wildfire that interrupted his training camp at Big Bear Lake leading up to that fight, I'm not disagreeing with the facts above.
I just don't agree with the opinionated conclusions that follow up with that. Personally I like a win over a 40+ and 0 fighter who was at the very top of the P4P List and had a Middleweight World Belt to boost as preparation for 160. But that's just me.
That's like if Sergio Martinez knocked out 41-0 Floyd Mayweather in a TItle defense. Years later you can brush that win aside and critique it as a win over a smaller weight fighter, but it was a great win at that time, against a P4P great.
However, is not a greater win than the Barrera win. Yes is nice to have an undefeated record. But, people to much stock on W-L record. Especially on here and I don't get that. That really means little, it really does. But, whatever.
Fact is, and as much as it hurts me to say and people here who know me knows how I feel about Tito, Barrera is a greater fighter than Trinidad was period. And, Barrera was in his prime, or the very worse at the tail end of his prime. Was the king of the featherweight division and an elite P4P level as well.
The Barrera win>>>>The Tito win.Comment
-
Holyfield was about 5 years too shot. As good of a win as ODLH on Manny's resume. You idiots don't count that win though right? So why do you count Holyfield? self contradicting idiots.
McCallum is a first ballot Hall of famer? Is Nunn? What about Barkley?
Cotto beat Shane. That is a first ballot hall of famer. Mosley > All those wins. Period.Comment
-
Come on, Hopkins is a whole 'nother level than the Raheems and Junior's of the world.
I give Marquez a better shot at Hopkins, than Morales and Barrera. Ultimately Hopkins ****s all 3.Comment
-
Except for Jones, who Hopkins lost to, who has Hopkins fought with the boxing skills of Morales, Barrera, and Marquez? Those three are all tremendous boxers.Comment
Comment