better resume..hopkins,pacman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #101
    Originally posted by No Ceilings
    I dont know man. Taylor is pretty underrated around here. He was better than a lot of people gave him credit for.
    naw jmm,morales.barerra>>>>>>>>>>>>>taylor

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #102
      Not a popular opinion, but B-Hop

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 739
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #103
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        ****ing Rican!

        No but seriously, I can't stand this whole 'size' **** with Pac's wins.

        Margarito isn't even close to his best win, at all. Hell, it's not even a legit win for him. Why all the 'size' this and 'size' that? It's so ******.

        Compare Whitakers win over Nelson to Pac's win over Margarito. I guess 'size' means Pac's win over Margarito is better.

        So ****ing idiotic seriously.
        Is the argument that noobs make.

        And, is clear that Rassclot or whatever his name is. Became a boxing fan after Pac-Oscar.

        I mean he didn't know that "The body snatcher" is in the HOF.

        I bet you he only knows the fat out of shape HW Toney. Doesn't know the 90's Toney. That is why he compares Cotto to him.

        That is why when he mentioned all of Pac wins. He didn't mention Pac greatest win, which is Barrera. If you notice he mentioned the wins that happened after Oscar. Because, that's when he started being a fan.

        Comment

        • -Kev-
          this is boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 39960
          • 5,045
          • 1,449
          • 234,543

          #104
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          Morales was at a weight he never had fought at and nowhere near his best when he fought Raheem, that proves nothing. That's like saying Hopkins right now is at his best and we should compare prime fighters to Hopkins right now. And yes Barrera has two random losses to Junior Jones, Hopkins has two random losses to Jermain Taylor, who isn't half the fighter Marquez, Barrera, or Morales were.
          Damn man, saying Morales was nowhere near his best when he fought Raheem is unfair, considering he just came off beating Pacquiao. If Raheem fought a way past Morales, then imagine what version of Morales Pacquiao fought.

          Comment

          • Larry the boss
            EDUCATED
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 90798
            • 6,419
            • 4,473
            • 2,500,480

            #105
            im not gonna vote on the matter..but using the size angle is laughable considering mannys best wins were 130 and under

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #106
              This is hard.

              They both have similarly impressive welterweight resumes.

              I cant decide

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #107
                Originally posted by No Ceilings
                I dont know man. Taylor is pretty underrated around here. He was better than a lot of people gave him credit for.
                He was good but he proved that he isn't in the same league as Barrera, Morales or Marquez. Not even close. He had his moment against a Hopkins who was beginning to fade, made a couple decent defenses, and got pasted by Kelly Pavlik. That's not anything close to being mentioned among two of the greatest ever to step in the ring at 122 and 126.

                I'm not saying Hopkins gets dominated by those three, but come on Hopkins never dominated fighters that good. He might not have even fought fighters that good, again other than Roy who he lost to.

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #108
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  Is the argument that noobs make.

                  And, is clear that Rassclot or whatever his name is. Became a boxing fan after Pac-Oscar.

                  I mean he didn't know that "The body snatcher" is in the HOF.

                  I bet you he only knows the fat out of shape HW Toney. Doesn't know the 90's Toney. That is why he compares Cotto to him.

                  That is why when he mentioned all of Pac wins. He didn't mention Pac greatest win, which is Barrera. If you notice he mentioned the wins that happened after Oscar. Because, that's when he started being a fan.
                  notice how he vanished after owning himself

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    This is hard.

                    They both have similarly impressive welterweight resumes.

                    I cant decide
                    lol....................

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49568
                      • 5,042
                      • 270
                      • 104,043

                      #110
                      Originally posted by jrosales13
                      Is the argument that noobs make.

                      And, is clear that Rassclot or whatever his name is. Became a boxing fan after Pac-Oscar.

                      I mean he didn't know that "The body snatcher" is in the HOF.

                      I bet you he only knows the fat out of shape HW Toney. Doesn't know the 90's Toney. That is why he compares Cotto to him.

                      That is why when he mentioned all of Pac wins. He didn't mention Pac greatest win, which is Barrera. If you notice he mentioned the wins that happened after Oscar. Because, that's when he started being a fan.
                      Right. It just annoys the hell out of me man.

                      Maybe not as much as someone saying Hopkins is greater than Monzon at Middleweight does. But it still drives me insane

                      I'm not one to judge but I would bet you are right about all of that

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP