better resume..hopkins,pacman

[boxing2106]

the question was bigger resume not bigger wins why change the topic at hand?? hopkins and its not even close.

[street bully]

Hopkins. Pacquaio has been fighting washed up fighters, Hopkins is seen as the old guy in his fights now.

[damned1974]

You really haven't a clue aren't you? You think you will become 3X FOTY and FOTD by fighting bums? The fact that Pac became 3x FOTY and FOTD it means he beat a lot of very good fighters, maybe a few HOF material fighters. Guess how many HOF fighters in this list.

Sasakul
Ledwaba
barrera
morales
jmm
Diaz
Oscar - just like he has no business fighting Bhop
cotto
hatton
Margarito

If Hopkins resume was really that good so it means he beat a lot of good fighters then why his fellow American writers (BWAA) did not voted him as FOTD in his reign?

Are you thick-headed???? The topic is WHO has the BETTER RESUME.None of this fantasy FOTY crap-that plays no part in who has the better scalps.We are talking who's got the best names on resumes....we can even compare the quality of both opponents if you wish,and where they were at with their careers when both guys fought... then you can embrace that boxing writer bull**** all you want.

Do you usually let people (like BWAA) think for you?B-Hop has fought the better opponents on his resume-hands down.The quality they were when he fought them while being an underdog further confirms this...when you are ready to debate why you think wins like Sasakul and Diaz are comparable to names like Trinidad, Johnson, Pavlik,Tarver (3 of these mentioned were undefeated, while Hopkins was the severe underdog in 3 of these as well),etc...then start speaking.Call your bf Manny and tell him to start taking some risks and fight some undefeated,prime fighters...then he will get more credit.Until then,he is a cherry picker.

[straightleft]

Hopkins. Pacquaio has been fighting washed up fighters, Hopkins is seen as the old guy in his fights now.

You right Pac has been fighting washed fighters, weight drained, old, shot and past his prime according to these certain people but then the very the same people keep flooding the board telling Pac should take Floyd OST and then the very the same people also against the idea that Hopkins must be on PEDs and should not take any OST. Did you see the double standard, irony and the hypocrisy of these people?

[damned1974]

Simple questions such as this thread are confusing *******s...Don't dare ask them what existed before Manny's Oscar fight-lmfao

[damned1974]

You right Pac has been fighting washed fighters, weight drained, old, shot and past his prime according to these certain people but then the very the same people keep flooding the board telling Pac should take Floyd OST and then the very the same people also against the idea that Hopkins must be on PEDs and should not take any OST. Did you see the double standard, irony and the hypocrisy of these people?

Your A.D.D. must be kicking in...stay on topic-who has the better resume and why.If you must indulge in drug tests,just remember that Manny said "no",while Bernard said he would...even AFTER the negotiations.Big difference.BTW-just to spare your confusion..this is about Bernard and Manny-not Floyd.

Just to let you in on a secret-OST has no bearing on resumes!

[street bully]

You right Pac has been fighting washed fighters, weight drained, old, shot and past his prime according to these certain people but then the very the same people keep flooding the board telling Pac should take Floyd OST and then the very the same people also against the idea that Hopkins must be on PEDs and should not take any OST. Did you see the double standard, irony and the hypocrisy of these people?

Neither are on roids. Hopkins would have been washed up like toney or holyfield if he was on the juice, that **** shortens your career man.

[straightleft]

Are you thick-headed???? The topic is WHO has the BETTER RESUME.None of this fantasy FOTY crap-that plays no part in who has the better scalps.We are talking who's got the best names on resumes....we can even compare the quality of both opponents if you wish,and where they were at with their careers when both guys fought... then you can embrace that boxing writer bull**** all you want.

Do you usually let people (like BWAA) think for you?B-Hop has fought the better opponents on his resume-hands down.The quality they were when he fought them while being an underdog further confirms this...when you are ready to debate why you think wins like Sasakul and Diaz are comparable to names like Trinidad, Johnson, Pavlik,Tarver (3 of these mentioned were undefeated, while Hopkins was the severe underdog in 3 of these as well),etc...then start speaking.Call your bf Manny and tell him to start taking some risks and fight some undefeated,prime fighters...then he will get more credit.Until then,he is a cherry picker.

LOL! most Hopkins big wins were against the guy smaller than him in those time. You don't flash me with Hopkins beat better names but when you look further deep inside is no difference like welterweight Mayweather beating the hell out of lightweight Marquez.

[damned1974]

You right Pac has been fighting washed fighters, weight drained, old, shot and past his prime according to these certain people but then the very the same people keep flooding the board telling Pac should take Floyd OST and then the very the same people also against the idea that Hopkins must be on PEDs and should not take any OST. Did you see the double standard, irony and the hypocrisy of these people?

Glad we came to face the recent truth...it will set you free!

[straightleft]

Glad we came to face the recent truth...it will set you free!

But then Pac should take the OST right? pick a side and don't try to swim in two rivers at the same time. tool!