Ali didn't use speed against Foreman.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Postmalignaggi vs cotto
Hamed vs Barrera
Camacho vs Chavez
oh wait..... lol.
Barrera again is superior to Hamed skill wise and intelligence. Barrera isn;t even slow.
Paulie has no power nor a right hand and Cotto is clearly the better fighter. Cotto at 140 wasn't slow.
I get what you mean that not speed alone, that is true but Pac holds a lot of other advantages too, particularly power.
Bradley is good, everything is good about him from chin to speed, but he isn't great.
Comment
-
same bradley that went down against holt? LOL
bumping this thread once fight is over. you scrubs better not punk outLast edited by thedarkness; 06-08-2012, 07:34 PM.
Comment
-
sugar ray leonard overrated at welterweight
should he really be considered in the top 5 welterweight like most experts have him i dnt think he should he made his name there bt the only great ww i know of he beat there was thomas hearns
roberto duran and wilfred benitez didnt make theyre name at welterweight and arent considered to be great welterwights.
plzz give me your input on this subject
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Unseen View PostChavez is superior to Camacho, he is a top 2 latino boxer.
Barrera again is superior to Hamed skill wise and intelligence. Barrera isn;t even slow.
Paulie has no power nor a right hand and Cotto is clearly the better fighter. Cotto at 140 wasn't slow.
I get what you mean that not speed alone, that is true but Pac holds a lot of other advantages too, particularly power.
Bradley is good, everything is good about him from chin to speed, but he isn't great.
lol, you get what I mean though.
I'm not even saying speed isn't a good thing. I'm just pointing out, it's not the end all, be all.
I know those dudes are skillful but they obviously aren't the faster man in those contests.
Comment
Comment