I didn't call cotto a no-hoper, martinez did.... which makes me wonder, why would martinez then want to fight a no-hoper?
no he didn't lol, show me exactly where it says that, who Martinez is actually talking about is Mosley u dummies, i don't know how that is so hard to comprehend, or even Margarito...
you see people like u are why this site is messed up, where does Martinez say Cotto is a no hoper, he's actually saying Cotto is one of the best bro, and wants to fight him, do u have trouble with reading comprehension, or are u just locked in one opinion?
Like who's the one having trouble with reading comprehension right now LOL.
True, True. But does Martinez have the popularity with the casual boxing fans? IMO, he doesn't and thus will not give Pac as big as a payday as Mosley which has better name recognition among the casual boxing fan. The fight between Pac and Martinez would only make monetary sense for Martinez and not so much Pac.
I totally agree... but it doesn't make sense for me for martinez to criticize pac for fighting no-hopers, then to hypocritically turn around and say in the same article that he wants to fight cotto, a no-hoper than pac already beat.
you see people like u are why this site is messed up, where does Martinez say Cotto is a no hoper, he's actually saying Cotto is one of the best bro, and wants to fight him, do u have trouble with reading comprehension, or are u just locked in one opinion?
use simple logic...
pac fought cotto
martinez calls guys pac fights no-hopers
ergo: cotto is a no-hoper
martinez is implying that cotto is a no-hoper and yet he wants to fight him. doesn't make sense
Tweet
Comment