I totally agree... but it doesn't make sense for me for martinez to criticize pac for fighting no-hopers, then to hypocritically turn around and say in the same article that he wants to fight cotto, a no-hoper than pac already beat.
to be fair, i know what ur trying to say, cuz the article makes it look real bad, but to anybody with common sense this is clear, i don't understand why its so confusing as to even having to start a thread about it....
show me where it says tht Martinez says Cotto is a no hoper buddy, stop trolling and get it done...
What part of,' Middleweight king Sergio Martinez has taken a swing at Manny Pacquiao over his selection of opponents' don't you understand LOL. Dela Hoyd, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, and Mosley is part of Manny Pacquiao selection of opponents....OPPONENTS...NOT OPPONENT
To make it easy for Martinez....Pac vs Barerra > Martinez career
to be fair, i know what ur trying to say, cuz the article makes it look real bad, but to anybody with common sense this is clear, i don't understand why its so confusing as to even having to start a thread about it....
I'm not confused, I'm just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of martinez's statement.
Where does he say every single one of his opponents have been no-hopers, including Cotto? Yup, nowhere.
What part of,' Middleweight king Sergio Martinez has taken a swing at Manny Pacquiao over his selection of opponents' don't you understand LOL. Dela Hoyd, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, and Mosley is part of Manny Pacquiao selection of opponents....OPPONENTS...NOT OPPONENT
What part of,' Middleweight king Sergio Martinez has taken a swing at Manny Pacquiao over his selection of opponents' don't you understand LOL. Dela Hoyd, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, and Mosley is part of Manny Pacquiao selection of opponents....OPPONENTS...NOT OPPONENT
To make it easy for Martinez....Pac vs Barerra > Martinez career
wow, haha that serious huh?
pac vs barrera was a selection of opponent, was he a no hoper?
Comment