Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

why does martinez want to fight cotto?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    yeah, you're missing the point of the argument. the argument isn't that cotto is a no-hoper... that's based on you're personal opinion. martinez's personal opinion is that pac fights no-hoper. pac fought cotto. so by implication, cotto is a no-hoper in martinez's eyes. but martinez wants to fight cotto, a guy that he implied is a no-hoper. I don't get why martinez would fight a no-hoper when he accuses pac of fighting no-hopers.

    I'm just pointing out martinez's blatant hypocrisy.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by figzuki View Post
      wow, haha that serious huh?

      pac vs barrera was a selection of opponent, was he a no hoper?
      I'm sure that's all you can say because you know you have no case.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
        dude...ur grasp of implication logic is nonexistent.
        yup, co sign....

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
          dude...ur grasp of implication logic is nonexistent.
          you wouldn't know what implication logic is if it ****d you and left you for dead in it's basement.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by figzuki View Post
            yup, co sign....
            lmplication logic is stalking you next.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by ModernTalking View Post
              I'm sure that's all you can say because you know you have no case.
              lol, what do u mean all i can say, you basically just quit and went the 3rd grade route fool lol, what r u gonna say next? " i know you are, but am i?"

              to make it easy for u, we'll leave it as is, i see ur point, and hopefully u see mine, thats it...

              Comment


              • #47
                Cong**** OP! You just figured out Martinez is a hypocrite, just like nearly everyone else in this world. Including yourself.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                  lmplication logic is stalking you next.
                  nah sorry, thats like triangle thories, can't **** with those....

                  sergio said pac fights no hopers, pac fought cotto, so therefore he's a no hoper? lol

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                    yeah, you're missing the point of the argument. the argument isn't that cotto is a no-hoper... that's based on you're personal opinion. martinez's personal opinion is that pac fights no-hoper. pac fought cotto. so by implication, cotto is a no-hoper in martinez's eyes. but martinez wants to fight cotto, a guy that he implied is a no-hoper. I don't get why martinez would fight a no-hoper when he accuses pac of fighting no-hopers.

                    I'm just pointing out martinez's blatant hypocrisy.
                    Suddenly these Martinez boyfriends can't read and understand anymore LOL. Of course most boxing fans know that Cotto is a no-hoper but by the way how Martinez is clearly bashing Pac and slection of opponents, he's implying that Cotto is also a ho-hoper which he would love to fight.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      What about how its okay for Pacquiao to fight Martinez at 154 (even though Pacquiao never fought there in his entire life) but its not okay for Martinez to fight someone at 168 because his little muscles aren't ready and need time to grow? Martinez is a walking hypocrite machine.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP