yeah, you're missing the point of the argument. the argument isn't that cotto is a no-hoper... that's based on you're personal opinion. martinez's personal opinion is that pac fights no-hoper. pac fought cotto. so by implication, cotto is a no-hoper in martinez's eyes. but martinez wants to fight cotto, a guy that he implied is a no-hoper. I don't get why martinez would fight a no-hoper when he accuses pac of fighting no-hopers.
I'm just pointing out martinez's blatant hypocrisy.
I'm just pointing out martinez's blatant hypocrisy.
Comment