So the Ring has bumped Devon alexander to #4

[jrosales13]

Alexander winning that fight = ***** that didnt happen.

Its laughable that you're using the word "integrity" to defend a robbery. Absolutely laughable.

Again that is an opinion though. Even though is a popular opinion and an opinion that I agree with. It is still an opinion.

Fact is that some media members who were in attendance felt Alexander edged it out.

Sometimes being in an arena you score it differently from TV.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Sure you can if you want.

What is consistency that you ask for that you're asking?

Again P4P is based on opinion and opinion only.

Divisional rankings is based on factual body of work...

Consistency in the sense that Ring Magazine printed that they scored the fight for Kotelnik, thus they should print that they rank Kotelnik above Alexander in their own bloody rankings. I mean its not a difficult concept to grasp.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No logic would be that you rank the man who officially lost lower than the man who officially won in any ranking system.

No you rank who the better fighter is.

Have I slipped into bizarro world where everyone uses ***ed up and ******ed logic? I mean seriously...wtf?

[Bastian Loc]

Consistency in the sense that Ring Magazine printed that they scored the fight for Kotelnik, thus they should print that they rank Kotelnik above Alexander in their own bloody rankings. I mean its not a difficult concept to grasp.

Dirk, please stop. You're arguing with mongoloids. Everyone can see exactly what is happening but these trolls will never understand it.

[jrosales13]

Consistency in the sense that Ring Magazine printed that they scored the fight for Kotelnik, thus they should print that they rank Kotelnik above Alexander in their own bloody rankings. I mean its not a difficult concept to grasp.

Their division rankings goes by a panel. There is numerous people involved in deciding the factor. I think Cliff Rold from boxingscene is in that panel as well. But, I'm not so sure about that.

Scoring the fight for Kotelnik by The Ring was done by one writer who was in charge of covering that fight. It wasn't done by a panel of writers.

There is a difference really.

[cleaner147]

1.Bradley
2.Khan
3.Maidana

seems to be right, the rest should win a significant fight or fought in a FOTY-caliber to crack the TOP 3, period.

even tho I think Khan, Maidana and Kotelnik would beat Bradley, the list is credible until proven otherwise.

[pistol whip]

No you rank who the better fighter is.

Have I slipped into bizarro world where everyone uses ***ed up and ******ed logic? I mean seriously...wtf?

Ugh the person who wins is the better fighter hello!!!!!

[AntDawg]

Ugh the person who wins is the better fighter hello!!!!!

So if the judges had Margarito winning against Pacquiao you would seriously rank him higher and believe he is the better fighter?

[jrosales13]

So if the judges had Margarito winning against Pacquiao you would seriously rank him higher and believe he is the better fighter?

In a P4P sense no you would not rank Margarito higher.

But, at 154 probably...Neither are rank in the top 10 right now mind you. And, even if Marg he would not be rank in the top 10 now.

[AntDawg]

In a P4P sense no you would not rank Margarito higher.

But, at 154 probably...Neither are rank in the top 10 right now mind you. And, even if Marg he would not be rank in the top 10 now.

They are still ranked in the division just not top 10. How could you have rank someone higher who got destroyed but the judges gave it to him?