So the Ring has bumped Devon alexander to #4

[daggum]

not being biased but the rankings should be

1. khan
2. mccloskey
3. gavin rees













4. bradley

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So you want them to disregard "official" decisions?

And just make up rankings based on their personal opinions LOL!?

Then what would make them any diffrent than the WBC, WBA, IBF, or WBO?

Because thats exactly what the WBC, WBO, IBF, and WBA do already!

Good god. What do you think their p4p lists are based on? Theres no "official" way to show Pacquiao is the best fighter in the world. Its based on consensus opinion.

For *** sake. Its not hard to understand. They scored the fight for Kotelnik so its completely ******ed to then print in the very same magazine that Alexander is above him. Do you not see this?

[jrosales13]

Good god. What do you think their p4p lists are based on? Theres no "official" way to show Pacquiao is the best fighter in the world. Its based on consensus opinion.

For *** sake. Its not hard to understand. They scored the fight for Kotelnik so its completely ******ed to then print in the very same magazine that Alexander is above him. Do you not see this?

P4P list and rankings in a weight-classes are 2 totally different things though.

You go about it in different ways.

P4P list is a mythical opinion based rankings. While Divisional rankings is more factual body of work based rankings.

P4P=opinion
Divisional rankings does not =opinions. It should=factual body of work.

[Steak]

Good god. What do you think their p4p lists are based on? Theres no "official" way to show Pacquiao is the best fighter in the world. Its based on consensus opinion.

For *** sake. Its not hard to understand. They scored the fight for Kotelnik so its completely ******ed to then print in the very same magazine that Alexander is above him. Do you not see this?

I see it.

Alexander should be lower than Maidana and Kotelnik. hes lost two fights in a row, and he didnt even lose in good fashion in the last one. at least Maidana looked good in his loss.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

P4P list and rankings in a weight-classes are 2 totally different things though.

You go about it in different ways.

P4P list is a mythical opinion based rankings. While Divisional rankings is more factual body of work based rankings.

P4P=opinion
Divisional rankings does not =opinions. It should=factual body of work.

Its based on both. *** sake. Its not rocket science. Using your logic, one could rank Kotelnik below Alexander in the 140 rankings but above him p4p. Its ***in ****** logic. Consistency is all im asking for.

[pistol whip]

Good god. What do you think their p4p lists are based on? Theres no "official" way to show Pacquiao is the best fighter in the world. Its based on consensus opinion.

For *** sake. Its not hard to understand. They scored the fight for Kotelnik so its completely ******ed to then print in the very same magazine that Alexander is above him. Do you not see this?

No I don't see this because they know their opinion and there score is not the one that counts. They very well can't give credit or base their ranking on shhiitt that didn't happen. You can cry, biitch, and moan about the Kotelnik decision all you want but officially the W went to Devon.

I use the word integrity because unlike the crooked sanctioning bodies you talk about they have the "integrity" to not let their opinions dictate their ranking system.

[pistol whip]

Its based on both. *** sake. Its not rocket science. Using your logic, one could rank Kotelnik below Alexander in the 140 rankings but above him p4p. Its ***in ****** logic. Consistency is all im asking for.

No logic would be that you rank the man who officially lost lower than the man who officially won in any ranking system.

[jrosales13]

Its based on both. *** sake. Its not rocket science. Using your logic, one could rank Kotelnik below Alexander in the 140 rankings but above him p4p. Its ***in ****** logic. Consistency is all im asking for.

Sure you can if you want.

What is consistency that you ask for that you're asking?

Again P4P is based on opinion and opinion only.

Divisional rankings is based on factual body of work...

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No I don't see this because they know their opinion and there score is not the one that counts. They very well can't give credit or base their ranking on shhiitt that didn't happen. You can cry, biitch, and moan about the Kotelnik decision all you want but officially the W went to Devon.

I use the word integrity because unlike the crooked sanctioning bodies you talk about they have the "integrity" to not let their opinions dictate their ranking system.

Alexander winning that fight = ***** that didnt happen.

Its laughable that you're using the word "integrity" to defend a robbery. Absolutely laughable.

[Bastian Loc]

since when are judges promoters or sanctioning bodies??? how did u go that far??? ur trying too hard. dont hurt yourself.

lol wut a moron..