Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

whos greater all time Pacquiao or B-Hop?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
    this is a silly poll. everyone will pick Pacquiao because hes the current #1 p4p.

    later on down the round when Pacquiao loses in an upset and possibly gets KOed, a lot more reality will settle into people and his invincibility will dissapate.
    I doubt that will happen. Bob Arum is famous for trashing other fighters(he called Ali a one handed fighter) and said Pacquiao is the greatest of all time. *******s will eat this up man. They're blind and they'll believe anything the media says because they're fans.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
      and hes still active at his age i doubt pacquiao will be fighting at age 40+

      and hopkins has been doubted so many times and still comes threw.. no catchweight bs. example he moved up and beat tarver soundly
      It's not about age issue. Hopkins had three catchweight fights with Wright,Calzaghe and Pavlik.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by [KLTP] -Kirby- View Post
        BHop.

        20 Title defenses > 8 paper titles

        Considering how Bhop took on ALL challengers. Pacquiao fights whoever Bob Arum wants him to fight BHop has made a career of defeating those "next big stars". His only 3 loses in the past in the past 17 years have all been conversational where arguably he could of won all 3 fights. Pacquiao has beaten guys who have already established there career and only fought them based on there name and past accomplishments. Also BHop is an old man. He's nearly 50 years old and he's STILL dominating the sport and defeating those "next big stars" of today.

        What's the point of having 8 titles if you don't want to defend any of them? If Martinez wants to challenge for the 154 pound belt, he can't because he's "too big"....then why have the belt in the first place? The point of being a champion is to defend your fucking belt not using it as a prompt to make you look good.


        This is no contest. Whoever says Pacquiao is a *******. Plain and simple. I doubt they even watched a Bhop fight before.
        Bernard is one of the top 3 middleweights of ALL time.
        Hopkins did what the Klitschkos are doing now, defending against highly inferior contenders for those title defends

        His legacy is based on 20 defenses, not really beating the best possible

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by El C@cique@PR View Post
          TS your a moron Pacquiao is greater by far, lol at this ****
          That is not a clear cut thing. Im not saying its not a possibilty but its not a blowout either.

          Originally posted by Instinto View Post
          I'd better see Hopkins move up and beat Roy Jones jr,Toney rather than defending titles for 10 years. I honestly think that he could've beaten Jones jr. Because in his 10 year reign his best challengers were smaller Trinidad and DLH, who were coming from lower weight. After being defeated by Taylor, Hopkins eventually had his biggest fights streak Tarver,Wright,Pavlik,Calzaghe,Pascal.
          Are you really going to negate a ten year championship run to give Pac the nod? What can I say to that? SMDH

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
            Hopkins did what the Klitschkos are doing now, defending against highly inferior contenders for those title defends

            His legacy is based on 20 defenses, not really beating the best possible
            that wasnt his fault thier was no competition to ofcource taylor came and he did face him aswell !

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by hellogarci_24
              the last time i checked manny defended his wbo 147 title against clottey last march of 2010 and to mosley this coming july. he also defended some of his titles in the lower division...moron
              uhm wrong ! hes defending his 154 belt at 148 vs mosley ! im pretty sure arums move is hopeing that cotto wins his rematch vs margarito to make cotto and pac rematch unification at 154

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
                that wasnt his fault thier was no competition to ofcource taylor came and he did face him aswell !
                His legacy is based on fighting smaller guys coming up and defending against contenders

                There were better fights he could have taken so I dont care if it wasnt his fault that MW didnt have anybody

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by boxing2106 View Post
                  uhm wrong ! hes defending his 154 belt at 148 vs mosley ! im pretty sure arums move is hopeing that cotto wins his rematch vs margarito to make cotto and pac rematch unification at 154
                  Man STFU with your dumbass lies

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by studentofthegam View Post
                    Are you really going to negate a ten year championship run to give Pac the nod? What can I say to that? SMDH
                    Sure. Hopkins's status build on beating weak opponents for ten years. Guys like Hasegawa and Chris John have 10+ title defenses, are they also supposed to be considered ATG?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Im sure BHOP is GREATER than Floyd though...........thats for sure........

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP