Is Vitali Klitschko a top 10 heavyweight of all time?

[jimmy1569]

That is because, 19 of those 27 fights ended in the 1st round. Is hard to win a lot of rounds if the fights don't go past 1 round. Can Vitaly claim to have 19 1st rd KO's? I think not "D

Try again or stop using that silly logic Kapish!!!!

Nice try son..... but I ALREADY stated a few posts earlier that 1st rd ko's is more highlight than substance unless you do it every fight..2 rds is the difference here so i could care less how it was achieved. OK..SO WE HAVE 27 kos which means 27 rds.. right? What about those 40 non knockout rds.. You wanna tell me VALERO dominated as much as Vitali in his 42 non knockout rds? 19 out of 27 is 70% but the true percentage is 27 oout of 67 rds & this means 40%..so 60% of the rds he fought he was using the sweet science & NOT his knockout punch...similar to Vitali's sans 2 rds & we all know Vitali wins the highest percentage of his rds than any other legit fighter..... so I;m sure VALERO was in alot of toe to toe exchanges & didn't dominate as much as vITALI & THERE4 that kills his PER... AND I STAND by my statement that Vitali's is higher even when we use Vitali's entire career....... KAPISH!

[jrosales13]

Nice try son..... but I ALREADY stated a few posts earlier that 1st rd ko's is more highlight than substance unless you do it every fight..2 rds is the difference here so i could care less how it was achieved. OK..SO WE HAVE 27 kos which means 27 rds.. right? What about those 40 non knockout rds.. You wanna tell me VALERO dominated as much as Vitali in his 42 non knockout rds? 19 out of 27 is 70% but the true percentage is 27 oout of 67 rds & this means 40%..so 60% of the rds he fought he was using the sweet science & NOT his knockout punch...similar to Vitali's sans 2 rds & we all know Vitali wins the highest percentage of his rds than any other legit fighter..... so I;m sure VALERO was in alot of toe to toe exchanges & didn't dominate as much as vITALI & THERE4 that kills his PER... AND I STAND by my statement that Vitali's is higher even when we use Vitali's entire career....... KAPISH!

It was 19 out of 27, and 18 of them were consecutive. And, did it in less rounds than Vitaly. Does, Vitaly have 18 consecutive 1st round KO's? What about 18 1st round kO's period?

I think not, so therefor Valero>Vitaly since KO PER matter so much.

KAPISH!!!!!!!

Nice try son.

[JAB5239]

It was 19 out of 27, and 18 of them were consecutive. And, did it in less rounds than Vitaly. Does, Vitaly have 18 consecutive 1st round KO's? What about 18 1st round kO's period?

I think not, so therefor Valero>Vitaly since KO PER matter so much.

KAPISH!!!!!!!

Nice try son.

Bro, how can you stand the ******ity of this thread? I just skimmed through it and the logic and reasoning in Vitaly's favor are WAY more ******ed than any Floyd-Pac thread. That right there is a sign and sometimes you just can't fix ******. This is one of those times.

[jrosales13]

Bro, how can you stand the ******ity of this thread? I just skimmed through it and the logic and reasoning in Vitaly's favor are WAY more ******ed than any Floyd-Pac thread. That right there is a sign and sometimes you just can't fix ******. This is one of those times.

i don't know is different from the Pac-May crap that I be getting into at times.

I might move out of NSB for awhile and become a resident in the history section There are more proper boxing conversations their. Plus I saw you have a thread talking about boxing of today so it can be the best of both worlds.

[jimmy1569]

It was 19 out of 27, and 18 of them were consecutive. And, did it in less rounds than Vitaly. Does, Vitaly have 18 consecutive 1st round KO's? What about 18 1st round kO's period?

I think not, so therefor Valero>Vitaly since KO PER matter so much.

KAPISH!!!!!!!

Nice try son.

Seriously...now.... to state the same thing again after i went deeper into the numbers is to play the fool. You're embarassing your self with that response. Ok... if you wanna state that Vilaro's KO per is slightly better...i'll give you that as 2 rds less is 2 rds less. So when he wasn't getting those 1st rd KO'S in those other 8 fights..wasn't Vitali NOW dominating those rds? Stick with the total 69-67... that's the END results... Now BOXING per TAKES everything into account & NOT just knockouts as I FULLY explained EARLIER..SO keep up with me... KO per i'll give u as the facts state it took Valero 2.48 rds TO GET his ko's while Vitali IT TOOK 2.55 rds..... do we understand each other SON?

[jrosales13]

Seriously...now.... to state the same thing again after i went deeper into the numbers is to play the fool. You're embarassing your self with that response. Ok... if you wanna state that Vilaro's KO per is slightly better...i'll give you that as 2 rds less is 2 rds less. So when he wasn't getting those 1st rd KO'S in those other 8 fights..wasn't Vitali NOW dominating those rds? Stick with the total 69-67... that's the END results... Now BOXING per TAKES everything into account & NOT just knockouts as I FULLY explained EARLIER..SO keep up with me... KO per i'll give u as the facts state it took Valero 2.48 rds TO GET his ko's while Vitali IT TOOK 2.55 rds..... do we understand each other SON?

Is Valero not Vilaro get it right. And, is not slightly better is better.

Not only did Valero did it in fewer rounds than Vitaly. And, only does Valero have the consecutive 1st rd KO's and total 1st rounds KO's over Vitaly.

But, he also was a 2 time champion which couldn't be said for Vitaly in his first 27 fights. Ouch, I'm just putting everything into count.

So therefor Valero=GOAT.

Do we understand each other SON?

[Earl-Hickey]

Is Valero not Vilaro get it right. And, is not slightly better is better.

Not only did Valero did it in fewer rounds than Vitaly. And, only does Valero have the consecutive 1st rd KO's and total 1st rounds KO's over Vitaly.

But, he also was a 2 time champion which couldn't be said for Vitaly in his first 27 fights. Ouch, I'm just putting everything into count.

So therefor Valero=GOAT.

Do we understand each other SON?

David Haye = 88.46% Ko's

Vitali Klitschko = 88.37% Ko's

David Haye is 0.09% better than Vitali Klitschko

[2Fast]

David Haye = 88.46% Ko's

Vitali Klitschko = 88.37% Ko's

David Haye is 0.09% better than Vitali Klitschko

lol lol lol thats actually the logic klitschko fans use.

[jrosales13]

David Haye = 88.46% Ko's

Vitali Klitschko = 88.37% Ko's

David Haye is 0.09% better than Vitali Klitschko

Sounds about right, to me.

[IronDanHamza]

It was 19 out of 27, and 18 of them were consecutive. And, did it in less rounds than Vitaly. Does, Vitaly have 18 consecutive 1st round KO's? What about 18 1st round kO's period?

I think not, so therefor Valero>Vitaly since KO PER matter so much.

KAPISH!!!!!!!
Nice try son.

I salute you for your paitience.