Is Vitali Klitschko a top 10 heavyweight of all time?

[jimmy1569]

Is Valero not Vilaro get it right. And, is not slightly better is better.

Not only did Valero did it in fewer rounds than Vitaly. And, only does Valero have the consecutive 1st rd KO's and total 1st rounds KO's over Vitaly.

But, he also was a 2 time champion which couldn't be said for Vitaly in his first 27 fights. Ouch, I'm just putting everything into count.

So therefor Valero=GOAT.

Do we understand each other SON?

Ok..son....you asked for it...... let;s do the first 26 fights & see where Valero stood at that point. Can you please tell me why it took him 66 rds to knockout his first 26 foes while it ONLY took Vitali 60 rds? This means Vitali was way quicker than VALERO & since it took VALERO 18 consecutive 1 st rd knockouts..doesn't that mean That Valero ONLY took over THE ko PER on fight #27 while VITALI was quicker overall in the fights 1-26? So VITALI WAS actually QUICKER TO dispose of his foes fro fight 1-26. Only reason VALERO took a slight advantage was because Vitali was toying with OBED sullivan for 9 rds in fight #27........ & like i told you..we're talking tons of more flesh being KO'ED by vk Than Valero.... so please stop son...there's more where this came from!

[jrosales13]

Ok..son....you asked for it...... let;s do the first 26 fights & see where Valero stood at that point. Can you please tell me why it took him 66 rds to knockout his first 26 foes while it ONLY took Vitali 60 rds? This means Vitali was way quicker than VALERO & since it took VALERO 18 consecutive 1 st rd knockouts..doesn't that mean That Valero ONLY took over THE ko PER on fight #27 while VITALI was quicker overall in the fights 1-26? So VITALI WAS actually QUICKER TO dispose of his foes fro fight 1-26. Only reason VALERO took a slight advantage was because Vitali was toying with OBED sullivan for 9 rds in fight #27........ & like i told you..we're talking tons of more flesh being KO'ED by vk Than Valero.... so please stop son...there's more where this came from!

First 26 fights? It took Vitaly 60 rounds huh? Wow very impressive Now I'm worried you bringing out the big guns you not playing around anymore I see.

And, I must admit Valero first 26 took him.........................58 rounds to KO his opponents. 1 round quicker than it took Vitaly...Damn, Valero still wins in that department

So please stop son...

But, I guess there is more where that came from huh?

[jimmy1569]

David Haye = 88.46% Ko's

Vitali Klitschko = 88.37% Ko's

David Haye is 0.09% better than Vitali Klitschko

I guarantee you if he fights Vitali next... Klitschko will take over again...so if he wants to hold on to that he better stay far away from Vitali & since he had a 100% ko ratio at the EXACT same stanza David HAYE is at now....just shows you what I THINK of that asterisked statistic esp..when 80% of that came in the cruiserweight division.. & what about there last fights... VitALI's thrashing was more worthy of a knockout than Fraudley's payday into the canvas. So Vitali WAS rightfully cheated out of a KO & should be at 90.6%..... You want more son...or are you through?

[jimmy1569]

First 26 fights? It took Vitaly 60 rounds huh? Wow very impressive Now I'm worried you bringing out the big guns you not playing around anymore I see.

And, I must admit Valero first 26 took him.........................58 rounds to KO his opponents. 1 round quicker than it took Vitaly...Damn, Valero still wins in that department

So please stop son...

But, I guess there is more where that came from huh?

Are you mathematically challenged? What don't you get about VALERO kO'ING his last foe in the first rd.. DOES this not mean 67-1 = 66 rds..while VitalY... 69RDS -9 RDS = 60..... I expect a full apology if you wanna save any type of face up in here......... i'm waiting son....................................

[jrosales13]

Are you mathematically challenged? What don't you get about VALERO kO'ING his last foe in the first rd.. DOES this not mean 67-1 = 66 rds..while VitalY... 69RDS -9 RDS = 60..... I expect a full apology if you wanna save any type of face up in here......... i'm waiting son....................................

I'm starting to think You do not know who Valero is. First you called him Vilaro then you said that he KO'd his last foe in the first round.

His last fight was against Antonio Demarco and it was NOT a 1st round KO. It was stopped I think after 9 rounds or so.

So I expect a full apology and I mean RIGHT NOW!!!!!

I'm waiting son.........

[Mersey]

"OK son... you asked for it...."

Holy shit, he's going to get you.

[2Fast]

Are you mathematically challenged? What don't you get about VALERO kO'ING his last foe in the first rd.. DOES this not mean 67-1 = 66 rds..while VitalY... 69RDS -9 RDS = 60..... I expect a full apology if you wanna save any type of face up in here......... i'm waiting son....................................

holy **** man. what the **** are you trying to proof. Do you even know anything about boxing? You are probalby one of those klitschko fans who won't watch boxing anymore after they are gone

[jimmy1569]

Are you mathematically challenged? What don't you get about VALERO kO'ING his last foe in the first rd.. DOES this not mean 67-1 = 66 rds..while VitalY... 69RDS -9 RDS = 60..... I expect a full apology if you wanna save any type of face up in here......... i'm waiting son....................................

Ok...my bad... i was looking at VALERO'S first fight..thinking it was his last fight.... It happens to the best of us... forgive & 4get!

[jimmy1569]

Since there 27th fights both took 9 rds...the 2 rd advantage remains for Valero.... but all the other intangibles remain the same.

[jrosales13]

Ok...my bad... i was looking at VALERO'S first fight..thinking it was his last fight.... It happens to the best of us... forgive & 4get!

No, I want a real apology and I mean right now!