Every Loser Has An Excuse
Every loser has an excuse as to why they lost but at the same time lack a compelling argument as to why they should have won. It seems all too easy to say "I was beat cause the other guy was on drugs" - easy because there are so many simple minded people out there that buy into it. Malignaggi lost to Cotto, Hatton, Khan and Diaz (though he was robbed in the Diaz fight) and he has only 6 KO's out of 28 wins - were all his defeats against people on drugs? He loses to the top contenders because he's a terrible fighter but rather than admit that, it's easy to just say "the other fighter was doping".
Every loser has an excuse as to why they lost but at the same time lack a compelling argument as to why they should have won. It seems all too easy to say "I was beat cause the other guy was on drugs" - easy because there are so many simple minded people out there that buy into it. Malignaggi lost to Cotto, Hatton, Khan and Diaz (though he was robbed in the Diaz fight) and he has only 6 KO's out of 28 wins - were all his defeats against people on drugs? He loses to the top contenders because he's a terrible fighter but rather than admit that, it's easy to just say "the other fighter was doping".
Comment