Originally posted by lfc19titles
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is TECHNICALLY better? David Haye or Wladamir Klitschko?
Collapse
-
-
I know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!
Comment
-
-
its discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ukr_Alex View Postits discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ukr_Alex View Postits discussions like this that show who know what the **** they are talking about.
Wlad is technically better.
Do you fellas even know what technical means? Go look up the definition.
Wlad is textbook. Everything that he does. The way he jabs, the way he throws the right, the hook, damn even the way he clinches is all done with correct boxing technique, hence he is technically better.
Haye is nothing like that. Haye is simply a fighter, he is not a technical fighter like Wlad is. He throws wild punches, there is not much "textbook" physics behind his punches, he is not technical, he is a slugger.
WLAD=Technical in every respect.
If anything these two fighters show a perfect contrast between technical and not technical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostI know haye hits hard and is fast, and i am almost thinking that is all you need.
I dont know what it is haye does that makes him so hard to beat? Even with a chin like his people dont seem to have an answer on how to beat him. Surely it should be as easy as landing a punch on his jaw? One of lifes mysteries? Arent you supposed to have a chin to reach the top? Look at the stick Khan still gets for getting knocked out ONCE!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostUnfortunatly not, went on for a painfully long time and is still ongoing.
His hook off the jab is textbook.
Lfctitles has zero credibility, don't even listen to him.
Comment
Comment