Who is TECHNICALLY better? David Haye or Wladamir Klitschko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pirao
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 3867
    • 131
    • 439
    • 10,171

    #11
    Wlad and it's not even close. Wlad has better technique, better power, more reach... He's better in every aspect.

    Comment

    • TRAV1$
      Into the sunset, cousins
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2010
      • 5503
      • 201
      • 199
      • 12,248

      #12
      Originally posted by Pirao
      Wlad and it's not even close. Wlad has better technique, better power, more reach... He's better in every aspect.
      Who's the best at making excuses, though?

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        BoxingScene Icon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 49558
        • 5,042
        • 270
        • 104,043

        #13
        The question isn't 'Who is better' or 'Who would win' its only who is Technically better.

        Comment

        • Spray_resistant
          Vacant interim regular(C)
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 29680
          • 2,997
          • 1,583
          • 53,384

          #14
          Originally posted by Hitman Hodgson
          Haye is better technically than he's given credit for. To be honest I think if they were the same height, Haye would beat Vlad up pretty easily.
          He just jumps into power shots and has awful timing which is why he is so easily hit by slower opponents, its just like Berto.

          Comment

          • Boxing Scene
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 7105
            • 915
            • 1,705
            • 29,819

            #15
            There is absolutely no comparison here. Haye is technically inferior to Wlad. All he has is power and speed which Wlad has plenty of.

            Watch Haye vs. Valuev and your question should be answered.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 49558
              • 5,042
              • 270
              • 104,043

              #16
              Originally posted by Boxing Scene
              There is absolutely no comparison here. Haye is technically inferior to Wlad. All he has is power and speed which Wlad has plenty of.

              Watch Haye vs. Valuev and your question should be answered.
              I completly agree. I had a discussion with someone who was arguing that Haye is technically better than Wlad. Thats why i posed the question on here. I know Wlad is tehcniallly better than Haye.

              Comment

              • Pirao
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 3867
                • 131
                • 439
                • 10,171

                #17
                Originally posted by TRAV1$
                Who's the best at making excuses, though?
                Lol, touche.

                Comment

                • CarlosG815
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 3683
                  • 240
                  • 192
                  • 10,304

                  #18
                  Either Klitschko is technically better than David Haye.

                  David Haye isn't even good in an un-technical way. He tries to fight with an unorthodox style (Roy Jones wannabe?) and he isn't even good at that. It isn't natural. Not sure how someone such as him has had so much success. He is a product of superb matchmaking. When you watch great fighters like Roy Jones, Naseem Hamed, etc.. You can see that they are not textbook technical fighters, yet their natural ability is so clear to see, as they can do things no other fights can do and as you watch you ask yourself "How in the hell does he move like that?"

                  David Haye does not possess this ability and imo he always looks sloppy, off balance, etc. David Haye is just as big a phony as they come but that's just the way I see it.

                  Comment

                  • lfc19titles
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 8732
                    • 725
                    • 628
                    • 94,838

                    #19
                    all wlad can do is jab jab and hold, throws the odd right but holds if they get in

                    haye would out box and knock wlad out when they fought

                    haye bya country mile

                    Comment

                    • Rick Grimes
                      The Walking Dead
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 5517
                      • 253
                      • 18
                      • 517

                      #20
                      Jab, Jab, Jab, Grab with a size and reach advantage over your opponents, doesn't make Wlad all that technical. That's all he does.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP