Wlad and it's not even close. Wlad has better technique, better power, more reach... He's better in every aspect.
Who is TECHNICALLY better? David Haye or Wladamir Klitschko?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
He just jumps into power shots and has awful timing which is why he is so easily hit by slower opponents, its just like Berto.Comment
-
There is absolutely no comparison here. Haye is technically inferior to Wlad. All he has is power and speed which Wlad has plenty of.
Watch Haye vs. Valuev and your question should be answered.Comment
-
I completly agree. I had a discussion with someone who was arguing that Haye is technically better than Wlad. Thats why i posed the question on here. I know Wlad is tehcniallly better than Haye.Comment
-
Either Klitschko is technically better than David Haye.
David Haye isn't even good in an un-technical way. He tries to fight with an unorthodox style (Roy Jones wannabe?) and he isn't even good at that. It isn't natural. Not sure how someone such as him has had so much success. He is a product of superb matchmaking. When you watch great fighters like Roy Jones, Naseem Hamed, etc.. You can see that they are not textbook technical fighters, yet their natural ability is so clear to see, as they can do things no other fights can do and as you watch you ask yourself "How in the hell does he move like that?"
David Haye does not possess this ability and imo he always looks sloppy, off balance, etc. David Haye is just as big a phony as they come but that's just the way I see it.Comment
-
all wlad can do is jab jab and hold, throws the odd right but holds if they get in
haye would out box and knock wlad out when they fought
haye bya country mileComment
-
Jab, Jab, Jab, Grab with a size and reach advantage over your opponents, doesn't make Wlad all that technical. That's all he does.Comment
Comment